Brushing up on Hygiene: Are Nail Brushes the Unsung Hero of Clean Hands?
Last month, I focused the discussion within the blogs on handwashing. One aspect of handwashing that I did not cover was the use of nail brushes, and this is a question I am often asked while doing food safety training programs. The nail brush is an often-overlooked tool that can play a crucial role in ensuring hand hygiene. But it must be used correctly to be effective, otherwise it can have the opposite effect.
If you’ve followed our blogs at all or if you have ever worked in a foodservice operation, you know the importance of an effective hand hygiene program. Our hands are the primary tools in food preparation and handling. They encounter various surfaces and substances throughout the day, potentially harboring bacteria and pathogens. In a foodservice environment, nail care is essential to preventing foodborne illness. The areas under the fingernails are particularly prone to trapping dirt and microorganisms.
Nail brushes are simple devices and can be purchased on Amazon for as little as $5.00. They are designed to clean the areas under the fingernails and around the cuticles, where regular handwashing is generally not as effective. These brushes have stiff bristles that can dislodge trapped dirt and bacteria, ensuring a more thorough cleaning process. By incorporating the use of nail brushes into the handwashing routine, foodservice workers can significantly reduce the risk of contamination.
While a nail brush seems like an obvious tool to include in our handwashing arsenal, some states have been removing them from their food code, and the 2022 FDA Model Food Code has no requirement that a handwashing station include a nail brush (outside of the inclusion of a nail brush as one of the two effective control measures if an operation allows barehand contact with ready-to-eat foods). Why would this be? Even the annex three of the food code espouses the benefits of a nail brush, stating “the area under the fingernails, known as the “subungual space”, has by far the largest concentration of microbes on the hand and this is also the most difficult area of the hand to decontaminate. Fingernail brushes…have been found to be effective tools in decontaminating this area of the hand. Proper use of single-use fingernail brushes, or designated individual fingernail brushes for each employee, during the handwashing procedure can achieve up to a 5-log reduction in microorganisms on the hands.”
Nail brushes may seem like a small detail in the grand scheme of your food safety program, but their impact on hygiene and food safety can be substantial – either negatively or positively.
The reason they are not required in the food code and that many states are now removing the requirement is that nail brushes themselves must be kept clean to be effective. Think about the environment at the handwashing station, damp, sometimes wet, and a nailbrush can be dirty – which can cause bacteria to survive, and perhaps grow and thrive. If you read the portion above from annex three of the food code, it does note that a SINGLE-USE or DESIGNATED INDIVIDUAL fingernail brush can achieve a 5-log reduction. This is because of the difficulty operators have with keeping a reusable fingernail brush clean and sanitary. I believe it was EcoLab used to sell nail brushes with a sanitizer dish, but I cannot even find that on their website any longer, so I am assuming contamination became an issue and they stopped carrying them (or no one ordered them, so they discontinued them). They do still carry a nail brush, but without the sanitizing dish.
So, should you have a nail brush in your foodservice? I would encourage you to talk to your inspector first. While I have not heard this directly from inspectors, I have been told by many foodservice operators across the country that their local health department or inspector asked them not to have a nail brush on-site. If you are allowed to have a nail brush, I would encourage you to purchase single-use brushes (which are not cheap, but even Temu has a pack of 100 nail brushes for $0.079 each) or provide one for each employee and ask them to maintain it properly. If you and your inspector determine that a shared nail brush is acceptable for your organization (which I would tend to advise against more and more with the research I have read on these), be sure that you have a method to clean and sanitize it effectively after each use and store it properly.
Nail brushes may seem like a small detail in the grand scheme of your food safety program, but their impact on hygiene and food safety can be substantial – either negatively or positively. Give it some consideration before implementing the use of nail brushes in your operation and make sure it is a positive addition to your plan and not a negative one. Risk Nothing.
Flour Safety: Don’t Let E. coli become the Secret Ingredient in your Cake.
Earlier this month, we started to see information coming out about a foodborne illness outbreak from an unlikely source – flour. As of early-April, 12 people had fallen ill, and three people had been hospitalized as a result of flour contaminated with Salmonella. While the outbreak is still in its early stages, no individuals have died because of their illness. A specific source has not yet been identified in the outbreak, but all who have fallen ill have reported eating raw batter or dough due before developing symptoms – and flour has been identified as the only common ingredient in these batters and doughs.
Be Proactive and Don’t End Up in Food Safety Jail!
Ok, I admit – there really is no food safety jail. But there is jail and, while it is uncommon, you can be sent there for not practicing food safety. Just the other day, I ran across a news report about two individuals in Wales who were sent to jail (albeit a suspended sentence) for “failing to take action to protect food from the risk of contamination; placing unsafe food on the market; failing to comply with a Remedial Action Notice and operating the business without approval after permission to supply seafood was suspended.”
Was that last 24 Hour “Bug” You Had Really a Foodborne Illness in Disguise?
Within this blog, I have discussed many foodborne pathogens: E. coli, Hepatitis, Salmonella, Listeria monocytogenes, and Campylobacter. But we’ve somehow managed to omit Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus).
30 Years Later: The Foodborne Illness Outbreak that Changed Food Safety
In January, we hit a major anniversary. One I am betting snuck by many of you – including me! January marked 30 years since the deadly 1993 E. coli O157:H7 outbreak at Jack in the Box restaurants on the west coast. The anniversary wasn’t on any of the major news networks that I recall. It did make it into a few newspapers, at least one or two of the newspapers that are left. It wasn’t until late-February that I realized it.