Was that last 24 Hour “Bug” You Had Really a Foodborne Illness in Disguise?

Within this blog, I have discussed many foodborne pathogens: E. coli, Hepatitis, Salmonella, Listeria monocytogenes, and Campylobacter.  But we’ve somehow managed to omit Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus).

It isn’t that it is any less important than the others we have discussed. S. aureus causes a wide variety of infections, from skin infections to diseases that can be potentially fatal.  And while it isn’t among the top foodborne illnesses in the United States, estimates indicate that S. aureus causes just less than 250,000 illnesses in the United States each year.  It should be noted through, that these incidences may be much higher than estimated due to non-reports of the illness.

S. aureus can grow in a wide range of temperatures, from 44°F to 119°F and while most pathogens thrive in moist environments, S. aureus has the ability to survive dry and otherwise stressful instruments, such as the human nose and skin, and even on clothing and other surfaces.


The formation of these toxins is one reason why cooking the food will be of no use in protecting yourself or your guests.


Symptoms of S. aureus include nausea, vomiting, stomach cramps, and in most cases, diarrhea. Symptoms can begin as little as 30 minutes after consuming a food or beverage item contaminated with S. aureus but can sometimes take as long as 8 hours to manifest in symptoms. These symptoms usually last for no longer than 24 hours and rarely result in severe illness.

Does this sound like the last “24-hour” bug you or your children may have had?  This is one of the reasons why it is believed that the incidence of S. aureus is much higher than estimated, most simply do not visit a medical professional who can diagnose S. aureus.

The reason why S. aureus can make someone ill so quickly is because of the nature of the bacteria.  In the case of an S. aureus illness, the bacteria may have multiplied on the food since the time the food came into contact with the host food item. These bacteria then leave behind a toxin on the food, which is what causes the illness.  For example, think of a food that might have a cleaning chemical on it – it would make you sick very quickly after ingesting the item.

The formation of these toxins is one reason why cooking the food will be of no use in protecting yourself or your guests. Yes, cooking the product will eliminate the S. aureus bacteria, but it does not eliminate the toxin that the bacteria left behind.

Food items commonly implicated in S. aureus illnesses include milk and cheeses, but other food products that have been implicated in such illnesses include cold salads, sliced deli meats, sandwiches, cream-filled pastries, and puddings.

S. aureus is just one of the reasons why it is important to pay attention to safe food handling throughout the entire life of a product. Avoiding cross contamination, ensuring proper personal hygiene (unlike the sushi chef picture we used for the blogs – did you notice they were not wearing gloves?), and storing food at proper temperatures are key steps in protecting your operation from a S. aureus outbreak (and almost all other foodborne illnesses). Risk Nothing. 

The Politics of Food Safety – Part Two

Hi everyone. Keeping with the theme of politics, our blog postings for the month of November are about food safety regulations. In the first blog, we provided background on agencies and their oversight for different foods. In this blog, we are covering elements of the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) that was signed into law January of 2011.

The Politics of Food Safety – Part One

Well, unless you have had your ear buds in and have sequestered yourself from all media, you are aware that November is Election Month! November 6th is the day that voters across the country will weigh in on their representation at local, state, and national levels.

Food Defense Playbook

In the last blog, we raised the question of whether a defensive position is really needed for retail foodservices. I hope you were convinced that incorporating some defensive measures into daily practices will protect food inventory from risks--whether those risks are theft, spoilage, or intentional contamination. After all, food in inventory belongs to the operation so it makes sense to protect it from any risks while in your custody.

Food Defense—What is Your Game Plan?

We are into the season of Friday Night Lights and for many of you, this is a time when offensive and defensive strategies are discussed and rehashed during Monday morning quarterbacking sessions. Most of you working in foodservices have your “offensive” game under control with menu item and service strategies to ensure customer satisfaction--a big part of your play book. But, how is your “defensive” game? Do you have procedures in place to protect food from intentional contamination? In this blog, we will cover some background on food defense and discuss whether it really is a necessary strategy. In the second posting for this month, action steps for operations to consider will be presented.