Encouraging Behavior Change among Foodservice Employees
A few months ago, we published a blog about the human factor and food safety. Within that blog, we discussed a bit about behavior change, including the subjective norm. You might recall the subjective norm refers to the culture that either supports food safety, or not.
In training employees and managers about food safety, besides the subjective norm, we need to talk about the attitudes and barriers to food safety implementation. In academe, we always like to think of things in silos, that they are not dependent upon one another, but in the real-world, we know this is simply not the case. For example, if you have a positive food safety culture, positive attitudes and removing barriers to positive food safety behaviors would logically follow. Absent of either one of those, a positive food safety culture is not likely to exist.
What is each member of your team’s true attitude about food safety? You know…the attitude they have when your ears are not listening, or you are not in the kitchen. Part of starting to change attitudes is the employee (or manager) having a solid understanding of the rationale behind our practices. For example, a few years ago we were working with a large school system and helping them to improve their foods safety program. One of the things a colleague and I observed while doing on-site inspections was the employees were nice enough to have filled out the cooler temperature log for us. But, not just for that hour, for the entire week, yet it was only 7:45 on a Tuesday morning. Those employees were either clairvoyant or they were dry logging, and certainly the former couldn’t be true. The truth is that those employees understood what they were asked to do, but really didn’t comprehend WHY they were doing it. Thinking about it, if you had never worked in a commercial kitchen before, when was the last time you recorded a refrigerator temperature at home? Taking it one step further, when was the last time you made someone ill because you didn’t have proper refrigerator temperatures at home? It is easy to surmise that the employees who did this are lazy and simply did not want to do it, but we generally find that there is more to the story than this and simply taking the time to help them realize why we do these tasks helps them connect the dots to improve their behavior.
What is each member of your team’s true attitude about food safety? You know…the attitude they have when your ears are not listening, or you are not in the kitchen.
Removing barriers is also important. It is important to note these can be actual barriers or perceived barriers. I once had an employee who told me it took too long to wash his hands. Thus, he could not do it, because we (referring to the managers) were so focused on ticket times and getting food out to the guests, he simply didn’t have time to wash he hands that much. There were at least two wrong things with that statement. First, it really doesn’t take too long to wash your hands. In reality, you can wash your hands 12 times in four minutes (we even made a poster in a previous study to explore the impacts it would have on behavior). The second was that we were conveying the wrong message to our employees (but that will be the focus of another blog). In this case, it was a perceived barrier that was stopping him from washing his hands. An actual barrier we once observed while doing on-site observations at a restaurant was the lack of thermometers. When we asked the manager about the notable absence of any thermometers in the kitchen, he exclaimed he was not going to buy any more this quarter, because the employees were stealing them. While we could discuss what was really happening with the thermometers (and I doubt the employees were stealing these highly coveted bimetallic stemmed thermometers), regardless of what was happening with them, we need to have them available for our employees if we ever want them to take a temperature.
Although my life as a researcher and teacher at a university looks much different than it did a few years ago when I was in the foodservice industry, I do still appreciate and understand the challenges that come with running a foodservice operation. As an operator, you have many different irons in the fire, but thinking about modifying and changing employee behavior can have positive results throughout the organization, not just in the realm of food safety.
There are many aspects to anyone’s actual behavior. Taking the time to think through why an employee might do what they do can be key to changing their behavior for the positive – whether it be food safety related or not. As we have noted before, every operation has a food safety culture, we are hoping yours is a positive one. And if your culture is not quite there yet, perhaps exploring ways to encourage behavior change among your employees may be on the menu for the new year.
We hope you were able to join us on November 17th for our last SafeBites webinar of 2021, entitled, “Practicing Good Agriculture: A Primer for Foodservice Operations”. We will be announcing dates for the 2022 Safebites Webinar Series in the next month or so. If you have topics, you’d enjoy learning more about, please reach out and let me know. Risk Nothing.
Meat Color and Doneness: Persistent Pinking
Late in June, my family and I were able to visit the Black Hills, an area of the country in which I have not had the opportunity to spend much time. One evening, as we dined at a local restaurant, I observed a table across the dining room sending back a dinner. While I couldn’t hear the entire conversation and I certainly wasn’t trying to eavesdrop, it was apparent that the customer was unhappy with the cooking of their hamburger and was sending it back because it was too pink in the middle. That immediately brought to my mind the phenomenon known as persistent pinking. A term I became familiar with because of work done by some colleagues here at Kansas State, which they present each summer to a group of foodservice operators who join us on-campus for an in-depth week-long look at all things food safety.
Quat Binding – Why this Can Have a Disastrous Impact on Your Sanitation Program.
In June, I had the opportunity to represent FoodHandler and speak on food safety behavior for customers of Martin Bros. Distributing in Waterloo, Iowa. One of the questions that was asked caught me a little off guard. The question was about quat binding. It caught me off guard not because it was a bad question, but only because it was not something I had previously been asked nor had not yet been exposed to the phenomenon. However, I soon learned that in certain jurisdictions, it is resulting in changes to how sanitizing cloths are to be stored in sanitizing buckets (or not) in the foodservice industry. When I returned home from the trip, I had to dig into it to learn about what quat binding is and how it might impact foodservice operations.
Are Grades for Foodservice Inspections a Good Idea?
I generally try to stay away from controversial topics in my blog, but this is one I thought it might be interesting to discuss. Occasionally on my travels, I will come across a state or a local jurisdiction that requires foodservice inspection scores be posted in the window of the establishment. The idea is to allow would-be customers the ability to see how the foodservice operation in which they are about to eat scored on their latest health inspection.
Neglected Safety: CDC Report Casts Doubts on the Ability of the Foodservice Industry to Ensure Ill Workers Stay at Home
Early in June, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released a report outlining foodborne illness outbreaks in retail foodservice establishments. The report outlined outbreaks from 25 state and local health departments from 2017 through 2019.