Encouraging Behavior Change among Foodservice Employees
A few months ago, we published a blog about the human factor and food safety. Within that blog, we discussed a bit about behavior change, including the subjective norm. You might recall the subjective norm refers to the culture that either supports food safety, or not.
In training employees and managers about food safety, besides the subjective norm, we need to talk about the attitudes and barriers to food safety implementation. In academe, we always like to think of things in silos, that they are not dependent upon one another, but in the real-world, we know this is simply not the case. For example, if you have a positive food safety culture, positive attitudes and removing barriers to positive food safety behaviors would logically follow. Absent of either one of those, a positive food safety culture is not likely to exist.
What is each member of your team’s true attitude about food safety? You know…the attitude they have when your ears are not listening, or you are not in the kitchen. Part of starting to change attitudes is the employee (or manager) having a solid understanding of the rationale behind our practices. For example, a few years ago we were working with a large school system and helping them to improve their foods safety program. One of the things a colleague and I observed while doing on-site inspections was the employees were nice enough to have filled out the cooler temperature log for us. But, not just for that hour, for the entire week, yet it was only 7:45 on a Tuesday morning. Those employees were either clairvoyant or they were dry logging, and certainly the former couldn’t be true. The truth is that those employees understood what they were asked to do, but really didn’t comprehend WHY they were doing it. Thinking about it, if you had never worked in a commercial kitchen before, when was the last time you recorded a refrigerator temperature at home? Taking it one step further, when was the last time you made someone ill because you didn’t have proper refrigerator temperatures at home? It is easy to surmise that the employees who did this are lazy and simply did not want to do it, but we generally find that there is more to the story than this and simply taking the time to help them realize why we do these tasks helps them connect the dots to improve their behavior.
What is each member of your team’s true attitude about food safety? You know…the attitude they have when your ears are not listening, or you are not in the kitchen.
Removing barriers is also important. It is important to note these can be actual barriers or perceived barriers. I once had an employee who told me it took too long to wash his hands. Thus, he could not do it, because we (referring to the managers) were so focused on ticket times and getting food out to the guests, he simply didn’t have time to wash he hands that much. There were at least two wrong things with that statement. First, it really doesn’t take too long to wash your hands. In reality, you can wash your hands 12 times in four minutes (we even made a poster in a previous study to explore the impacts it would have on behavior). The second was that we were conveying the wrong message to our employees (but that will be the focus of another blog). In this case, it was a perceived barrier that was stopping him from washing his hands. An actual barrier we once observed while doing on-site observations at a restaurant was the lack of thermometers. When we asked the manager about the notable absence of any thermometers in the kitchen, he exclaimed he was not going to buy any more this quarter, because the employees were stealing them. While we could discuss what was really happening with the thermometers (and I doubt the employees were stealing these highly coveted bimetallic stemmed thermometers), regardless of what was happening with them, we need to have them available for our employees if we ever want them to take a temperature.
Although my life as a researcher and teacher at a university looks much different than it did a few years ago when I was in the foodservice industry, I do still appreciate and understand the challenges that come with running a foodservice operation. As an operator, you have many different irons in the fire, but thinking about modifying and changing employee behavior can have positive results throughout the organization, not just in the realm of food safety.
There are many aspects to anyone’s actual behavior. Taking the time to think through why an employee might do what they do can be key to changing their behavior for the positive – whether it be food safety related or not. As we have noted before, every operation has a food safety culture, we are hoping yours is a positive one. And if your culture is not quite there yet, perhaps exploring ways to encourage behavior change among your employees may be on the menu for the new year.
We hope you were able to join us on November 17th for our last SafeBites webinar of 2021, entitled, “Practicing Good Agriculture: A Primer for Foodservice Operations”. We will be announcing dates for the 2022 Safebites Webinar Series in the next month or so. If you have topics, you’d enjoy learning more about, please reach out and let me know. Risk Nothing.
Was that last 24 Hour “Bug” You Had Really a Foodborne Illness in Disguise?
Within this blog, I have discussed many foodborne pathogens: E. coli, Hepatitis, Salmonella, Listeria monocytogenes, and Campylobacter. But we’ve somehow managed to omit Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus).
30 Years Later: The Foodborne Illness Outbreak that Changed Food Safety
In January, we hit a major anniversary. One I am betting snuck by many of you – including me! January marked 30 years since the deadly 1993 E. coli O157:H7 outbreak at Jack in the Box restaurants on the west coast. The anniversary wasn’t on any of the major news networks that I recall. It did make it into a few newspapers, at least one or two of the newspapers that are left. It wasn’t until late-February that I realized it.
Does Temperature Really Matter when Washing your Hands?
In January, I reviewed the changes to the 2022 Food Code in my blog (check out Part I and Part II), and one change to the food code that I had mentioned, but didn’t discuss in-depth, was the change that lowered the water temperature a hand sink was required to produce to 85°F, as noted in Section 2-202.12 of the code. This requirement has been in place since the publishing of the 2001 Food Code, which required a water temperature of 100°F. Prior to this, 110°F was required (see the 1999 Food Code). So why the change and does water temperature when washing your hands really matter?
Hand sinks: Often Taken for Granted, but an Essential Part to Effective Hand Hygiene
Late in January, I received a question about hand sinks in a foodservice operation. The question pertained to school staff (teachers and aides) who were using a hand washing sink in the school kitchen. The question came as a matter of who was allowed access to the kitchen to use the sink, but the question itself caused me to go down a rabbit hole of requirements for hand washing sinks in foodservice operations.