The FDA Food Code Requirement for the Person in Charge
Every restaurant has someone running the show during any given shift. The FDA Food Code has a name for that person, the Person in Charge (PIC), and it has a very specific set of obligations attached to the role.
Sections 2-101 and 2-103 define who the PIC is, what they must know, and what they’re personally responsible for during every hour of operation. A few weeks ago, I had the opportunity to participate in a question review for a licensed food safety exam provider, and we had a rich discussion about the PIC requirement and its implications for operators. Each person on the call had somewhat similar thoughts about the provision, but they also differed a bit. Thus, I thought digging into this requirement might make an interesting blog post.
The PIC is the individual present at a food establishment who is responsible for the operation at the time of inspection. Two details matter here: the PIC must be physically present, and the role rotates with each operating period. If the general manager goes home and the closing manager is the most senior person in the building, that manager is the PIC, with all the obligations that come with it.
Does the person have to be a “manager”? In other words, could you appoint a lead cook or a shift lead to serve as the PIC? Absolutely! The food code does not attach a specific title to the person in charge. Any lead employee could serve as a PIC if they meet the knowledge requirements under the code.
The Food Code doesn’t just require someone to be in charge who simply assigns tasks and tells people when they can leave for the day. Rather, the PIC must demonstrate knowledge of foodborne illness prevention. That means they must either be a certified food protection manager or demonstrate knowledge by answering a health inspector’s questions during an inspection.
In practice, your PIC should be able to speak confidently about proper cooking, holding, and cooling temperatures; the employee health policy; allergen information for your menu; and the specific food safety controls in your operation.
…The most important food safety tool in any kitchen isn’t a thermometer, it’s a knowledgeable, present, engaged PIC…
- Employees are properly trained in food safety and allergen awareness before working independently.
- The employee health reporting system is functioning, meaning that staff know to report symptoms and diagnoses to the PIC, and the PIC knows what to do with those reports.
- New hires are screened for relevant health conditions before they start handling food.
- Handwashing practices are actively monitored, not just assumed.
- Foods are received from approved suppliers, are received at correct temperatures, and are protected from contamination.
- Ill employees are kept away from food, even if they haven’t self-reported.
- Cross-contamination is controlled through proper storage, equipment use, and product flow.
- Temperature requirements are met for cold holding, hot holding, cooking, cooling, and thawing.
- Sanitizing solutions are at proper concentration, are actively monitored, and are properly used.
When a health inspector arrives, they identify the PIC first. Every question, every finding, and every corrective action runs through that person. A PIC who can’t answer knowledge questions or locate documentation is demonstrating non-compliance in real time, and that’s a violation in itself.
The PIC requirement isn’t bureaucratic overhead. It’s built on a simple, evidence-based insight: when someone knowledgeable is consistently in charge of food safety, outbreaks are less likely to happen. During a busy service with dozens of meals going out every hour, there are hundreds of food safety decision points. The PIC is the person whose job it is to actively think about each of them. The most important food safety tool in any kitchen isn’t a thermometer; it’s a knowledgeable, present, engaged PIC.
These sections are among the most consequential in the entire code and treating them as a box to check won’t move the needle on food safety. The operators who truly embrace the PIC requirement, those who understand why it exists and make sure they have a real food safety champion on every shift, are the ones protecting their customers, not just skating by to appease regulators. Risk Nothing.
READ MORE POSTS
Is Implementing a Color-Coded Food Safety Plan Right for your Operation?
Foodborne pathogens are by far the most prevalent cause of foodborne illness in the United States and across the world. There are 31 known agents that cause foodborne illnesses, and more that are unspecified or yet undiscovered – remember, E. Coli 0157:H7 wasn’t identified until the early-1980s. It is estimated each year, 48 million illnesses occur because of these known and unknown pathogens, resulting in over 3,000 deaths.
Maintaining your Equipment: Is it the Missing Ingredient in your Recipe for Food Safety?
Although I am no longer in day-to-day operations, between our students and foodservice lab at the university and my volunteer activities in my local church, I keep a close hand in food production. This past week, I had the opportunity to lead a group of men at our church in preparation of a luncheon for 100 women who were attending a spirituality retreat. Over the course of the morning, I realized our main cooler in the kitchen was not functioning properly and was about 10˚F above the required temperature. While we do have a commercial kitchen, we do not routinely log temperatures, so when the unit started to malfunction is questionable. Even more concerning was not the lunch we were preparing for, but the dinner that was served the night before for 300+ families in the parish.
Contamination of Food: Let’s Get Physical
Earlier this month, we began a discussion about contamination of food. Our first blog focused on chemical contamination, but in this blog, I’d like to look at physical contamination of food.
Contamination of Food: Chemicals, Pesticides, and more, Oh My!
If you have followed our blogs, you have often heard us opine about food safety-related behavior and communication, food traceability, and other overarching food safety topics. We often don’t get into the weeds and discuss topics you may have learned about in your food safety training. But I thought we might circle back around and dig into a few of these topics for a few blogs. This month, I’d like to discuss food contamination, this blog will focus on chemical contamination of food and later this month, we will discuss physical contaminates.
