Print PDF

The FDA Food Code Requirement for the Person in Charge

Every restaurant has someone running the show during any given shift. The FDA Food Code has a name for that person, the Person in Charge (PIC), and it has a very specific set of obligations attached to the role.

Sections 2-101 and 2-103 define who the PIC is, what they must know, and what they’re personally responsible for during every hour of operation. A few weeks ago, I had the opportunity to participate in a question review for a licensed food safety exam provider, and we had a rich discussion about the PIC requirement and its implications for operators. Each person on the call had somewhat similar thoughts about the provision, but they also differed a bit. Thus, I thought digging into this requirement might make an interesting blog post.

The PIC is the individual present at a food establishment who is responsible for the operation at the time of inspection. Two details matter here: the PIC must be physically present, and the role rotates with each operating period. If the general manager goes home and the closing manager is the most senior person in the building, that manager is the PIC, with all the obligations that come with it.

Does the person have to be a “manager”?  In other words, could you appoint a lead cook or a shift lead to serve as the PIC? Absolutely! The food code does not attach a specific title to the person in charge. Any lead employee could serve as a PIC if they meet the knowledge requirements under the code.

The Food Code doesn’t just require someone to be in charge who simply assigns tasks and tells people when they can leave for the day. Rather, the PIC must demonstrate knowledge of foodborne illness prevention. That means they must either be a certified food protection manager or demonstrate knowledge by answering a health inspector’s questions during an inspection.

In practice, your PIC should be able to speak confidently about proper cooking, holding, and cooling temperatures; the employee health policy; allergen information for your menu; and the specific food safety controls in your operation.

 

…The most important food safety tool in any kitchen isn’t a thermometer, it’s a knowledgeable, present, engaged PIC…

The code further defines the PIC’s responsibilities during each shift. This isn’t a list of things to check when convenient. These are obligations that the code holds the PIC personally responsible for demonstrating. While not a complete list, here are a few highlights:
  • Employees are properly trained in food safety and allergen awareness before working independently.
  • The employee health reporting system is functioning, meaning that staff know to report symptoms and diagnoses to the PIC, and the PIC knows what to do with those reports.
  • New hires are screened for relevant health conditions before they start handling food.
  • Handwashing practices are actively monitored, not just assumed.
  • Foods are received from approved suppliers, are received at correct temperatures, and are protected from contamination.
  • Ill employees are kept away from food, even if they haven’t self-reported.
  • Cross-contamination is controlled through proper storage, equipment use, and product flow.
  • Temperature requirements are met for cold holding, hot holding, cooking, cooling, and thawing.
  • Sanitizing solutions are at proper concentration, are actively monitored, and are properly used.

When a health inspector arrives, they identify the PIC first. Every question, every finding, and every corrective action runs through that person. A PIC who can’t answer knowledge questions or locate documentation is demonstrating non-compliance in real time, and that’s a violation in itself.

The PIC requirement isn’t bureaucratic overhead. It’s built on a simple, evidence-based insight: when someone knowledgeable is consistently in charge of food safety, outbreaks are less likely to happen. During a busy service with dozens of meals going out every hour, there are hundreds of food safety decision points. The PIC is the person whose job it is to actively think about each of them. The most important food safety tool in any kitchen isn’t a thermometer; it’s a knowledgeable, present, engaged PIC.

These sections are among the most consequential in the entire code and treating them as a box to check won’t move the needle on food safety. The operators who truly embrace the PIC requirement, those who understand why it exists and make sure they have a real food safety champion on every shift, are the ones protecting their customers, not just skating by to appease regulators. Risk Nothing.

READ MORE POSTS

Flour Safety: Don’t Let E. coli become the Secret Ingredient in your Cake.

Earlier this month, we started to see information coming out about a foodborne illness outbreak from an unlikely source – flour. As of early-April, 12 people had fallen ill, and three people had been hospitalized as a result of flour contaminated with Salmonella. While the outbreak is still in its early stages, no individuals have died because of their illness. A specific source has not yet been identified in the outbreak, but all who have fallen ill have reported eating raw batter or dough due before developing symptoms – and flour has been identified as the only common ingredient in these batters and doughs.

Be Proactive and Don’t End Up in Food Safety Jail!

Ok, I admit – there really is no food safety jail. But there is jail and, while it is uncommon, you can be sent there for not practicing food safety. Just the other day, I ran across a news report about two individuals in Wales who were sent to jail (albeit a suspended sentence) for “failing to take action to protect food from the risk of contamination; placing unsafe food on the market; failing to comply with a Remedial Action Notice and operating the business without approval after permission to supply seafood was suspended.”

30 Years Later: The Foodborne Illness Outbreak that Changed Food Safety

In January, we hit a major anniversary.  One I am betting snuck by many of you – including me! January marked 30 years since the deadly 1993 E. coli O157:H7 outbreak at Jack in the Box restaurants on the west coast. The anniversary wasn’t on any of the major news networks that I recall. It did make it into a few newspapers, at least one or two of the newspapers that are left.  It wasn’t until late-February that I realized it.