The FDA Food Code Requirement for the Person in Charge
Every restaurant has someone running the show during any given shift. The FDA Food Code has a name for that person, the Person in Charge (PIC), and it has a very specific set of obligations attached to the role.
Sections 2-101 and 2-103 define who the PIC is, what they must know, and what they’re personally responsible for during every hour of operation. A few weeks ago, I had the opportunity to participate in a question review for a licensed food safety exam provider, and we had a rich discussion about the PIC requirement and its implications for operators. Each person on the call had somewhat similar thoughts about the provision, but they also differed a bit. Thus, I thought digging into this requirement might make an interesting blog post.
The PIC is the individual present at a food establishment who is responsible for the operation at the time of inspection. Two details matter here: the PIC must be physically present, and the role rotates with each operating period. If the general manager goes home and the closing manager is the most senior person in the building, that manager is the PIC, with all the obligations that come with it.
Does the person have to be a “manager”? In other words, could you appoint a lead cook or a shift lead to serve as the PIC? Absolutely! The food code does not attach a specific title to the person in charge. Any lead employee could serve as a PIC if they meet the knowledge requirements under the code.
The Food Code doesn’t just require someone to be in charge who simply assigns tasks and tells people when they can leave for the day. Rather, the PIC must demonstrate knowledge of foodborne illness prevention. That means they must either be a certified food protection manager or demonstrate knowledge by answering a health inspector’s questions during an inspection.
In practice, your PIC should be able to speak confidently about proper cooking, holding, and cooling temperatures; the employee health policy; allergen information for your menu; and the specific food safety controls in your operation.
…The most important food safety tool in any kitchen isn’t a thermometer, it’s a knowledgeable, present, engaged PIC…
- Employees are properly trained in food safety and allergen awareness before working independently.
- The employee health reporting system is functioning, meaning that staff know to report symptoms and diagnoses to the PIC, and the PIC knows what to do with those reports.
- New hires are screened for relevant health conditions before they start handling food.
- Handwashing practices are actively monitored, not just assumed.
- Foods are received from approved suppliers, are received at correct temperatures, and are protected from contamination.
- Ill employees are kept away from food, even if they haven’t self-reported.
- Cross-contamination is controlled through proper storage, equipment use, and product flow.
- Temperature requirements are met for cold holding, hot holding, cooking, cooling, and thawing.
- Sanitizing solutions are at proper concentration, are actively monitored, and are properly used.
When a health inspector arrives, they identify the PIC first. Every question, every finding, and every corrective action runs through that person. A PIC who can’t answer knowledge questions or locate documentation is demonstrating non-compliance in real time, and that’s a violation in itself.
The PIC requirement isn’t bureaucratic overhead. It’s built on a simple, evidence-based insight: when someone knowledgeable is consistently in charge of food safety, outbreaks are less likely to happen. During a busy service with dozens of meals going out every hour, there are hundreds of food safety decision points. The PIC is the person whose job it is to actively think about each of them. The most important food safety tool in any kitchen isn’t a thermometer; it’s a knowledgeable, present, engaged PIC.
These sections are among the most consequential in the entire code and treating them as a box to check won’t move the needle on food safety. The operators who truly embrace the PIC requirement, those who understand why it exists and make sure they have a real food safety champion on every shift, are the ones protecting their customers, not just skating by to appease regulators. Risk Nothing.
READ MORE POSTS
Remembering the Importance of Food Safety During Food Safety Education Month
In the foodservice industry, every plate that leaves your kitchen carries not just flavors and aromas, but also the responsibility of providing safe and wholesome meals to customers. Celebrated each September, National Food Safety Education Month provides a platform for foodservice professionals to reaffirm their commitment to food safety. It's a reminder that excellence in foodservice operations must always be accompanied by excellence in food safety; a reminder that any great meal begins with safe food as the foundation.
Embracing Technology for Enhanced Food Safety in Foodservice Operations
Technology. We love it, we hate it. I’ve always been fascinated by technology; I remember getting my first Blackberry in the mid-90s and thinking it was the pinnacle of technological advances. Before that, I remember ordering a dictation program in college that was going to revolutionize the way I “typed” my assignments. Looking back, it really wasn’t worth the box that the program came in. Now, we have ChatGPT that will write the entire paper for us!
Meat Color and Doneness: Persistent Pinking
Late in June, my family and I were able to visit the Black Hills, an area of the country in which I have not had the opportunity to spend much time. One evening, as we dined at a local restaurant, I observed a table across the dining room sending back a dinner. While I couldn’t hear the entire conversation and I certainly wasn’t trying to eavesdrop, it was apparent that the customer was unhappy with the cooking of their hamburger and was sending it back because it was too pink in the middle. That immediately brought to my mind the phenomenon known as persistent pinking. A term I became familiar with because of work done by some colleagues here at Kansas State, which they present each summer to a group of foodservice operators who join us on-campus for an in-depth week-long look at all things food safety.
Quat Binding – Why this Can Have a Disastrous Impact on Your Sanitation Program.
In June, I had the opportunity to represent FoodHandler and speak on food safety behavior for customers of Martin Bros. Distributing in Waterloo, Iowa. One of the questions that was asked caught me a little off guard. The question was about quat binding. It caught me off guard not because it was a bad question, but only because it was not something I had previously been asked nor had not yet been exposed to the phenomenon. However, I soon learned that in certain jurisdictions, it is resulting in changes to how sanitizing cloths are to be stored in sanitizing buckets (or not) in the foodservice industry. When I returned home from the trip, I had to dig into it to learn about what quat binding is and how it might impact foodservice operations.
