Finding the Food Safety Training Program that is Right for You
In my final blog last month, I promised I would provide more information about food safety training programs offered for foodservice professionals. There are a few different options available to you.
Just last week, I was asked about the difference between all of them. For example, ServSafe has ServSafe Food Handler and ServSafe Manager. The Food Handler program is designed for employee-level positions and includes an assessment, but the assessment itself is not proctored. Whereas the ServSafe Manager program includes a proctored exam that must be passed at a predetermined level to be certified. The question I received was which one would suffice for the food code requirement for knowledge, to which I responded the ServSafe Manager program. Of course, the next question was why the Food Handler program would not suffice, after all it is cheaper to complete and does not require the need to find a proctor. The easy answer is because it does not have a proctored exam; however, to fully understand this, we really need to start with the food code.
Knowledge and certification requirements are spelled out in the FDA Model Food Code and are addressed in two ways. First, Section 2-102.11 mandates the knowledge requirement for the person in charge, which can be satisfied by one of three different methods: having no priority violations during the current inspection; being a certified food protection manager, having passed a test as part of an accredited program; or responding to the inspector’s questions about a variety of identified food safety topics. However, Section 2-102.11 goes on to require that for most foodservice operations, the person in charge must be a certified food protection manager who has passed an accredited test. Section 2-102.20 then goes on to state the way a food handler can satisfy the requirements spelled out in section 2–102.11 and 2-102.12 is to pass a certified food protection manager certification, which conforms to the Conference for Food Protection standards. Of course, each jurisdiction can have different standards, so it is imperative that you check your local requirements. Alaska, for example, not only requires the person in charge to be knowledgeable, but each food handler is expected to have a food worker card within 30 days of employment, which involves a food safety-focused training course, followed by passing an assessment exam.
Whichever you decide, because some jurisdictions have more stringent requirements than the conference for food protection, check with your local health department to make sure they also recognize the exam before you pay for it.
So, who is the Conference for Food Protection? Well, the United States Food and Drug Administration has a memorandum of understanding which recognizes the conference as the organization qualified to develop the standards to promote food safety. The conference is an independent, volunteer-led organization that brings together food industry experts from the government, academics, industry, and consumer organizations to address food safety issues. Several years ago, the conference identified the need to establish a set of uniform national standards to assess food safety certification programs. These standards would provide a basis to assess certification programs and allow jurisdictions (e.g., local health inspectors) to gage the quality of the certification. The conference developed the Standards for Accreditation of Food Protection Manager Certification Programs and maintains and updates these standards, as needed. The conference then contracts the American National Standard Institute to accredit these programs against the standard that the conference has developed.
With these standards in mind, the conference, and more specifically, the American National Standard Institute, works with organizations who would like to offer a food safety certification exam to make sure they meet the standards outlined by the conference. Below are organizations who are currently certified to offer the food safety certification exam and some basic information about the program.
Training: It appears this is designed for in-person training, but self-study options are allowed. There is an affiliate network that provides online training for an additional cost.
Exam: It appears the exams are done online, but only at a Pearson VUE testing center.
Training & Exam: $70.95
Self-Study Training Materials: $23.00
Exam only: $47.00
Examinees may take the exam up to three times without retaking the course. However, examinees MUST
retake the training course if failed more than three times. Additional exam vouchers will be necessary for repeated attempts.Of accredited programs, this was the most complicated of the websites to navigate.
Training: In-person or online
Exam: In-person or online, remote proctoring available.
Training & Exam: In-person costs will vary; online $152.92 plus proctor fee, $179 with testing center access. Convert to online proctoring for an additional $63.00.
Exam only: $36.00
If you fail the exam, you must repurchase a new exam, however the course remains free.
Training: Online
Exam: Remote proctoring, cost included with both the training and exam package and the exam only option.
Training & Exam: $78.00 + Remote Proctor Fee of $48.00
Exam only: $28.00 + Remote Proctor Fee of $48.00
Students allowed two attempts to pass the exam with no additional cost.
Accredited Food Manager Examinations[1]I am sure there are several of you out there who would like me to tell you which program is the best for you, but it all depends on how you learn, how you’d like to take the exam, and your budget. Certainly, there are a few programs which are designed for the employee who wants to take the class and exam from their home, but not all of us are interested in this. Look into each and use your best judgement. Whichever you decide, because some jurisdictions have more stringent requirements than the conference, check with your local health department to make sure they also recognize the exam before you pay for it.
Have you had good or bad experiences with either of these training and exams that you’d like to share? If so, drop me a note. I’d love to hear about your experiences and may be able to use this in a future blog. Risk Nothing.[1] Information is current as of 10/4/2021
[2] Fee is specific to the state and, in some cases, the county. It appears that most are $78.00.
Late in July, I was made aware that World Hepatitis Day was on July 28th. I do have to be honest – similar to most of you reading this, I was surprised there was such a thing. After doing a bit of research, I discovered July 28th was named as such to recognize the birthday of Dr. Baruch Blumberg, who first discovered the hepatitis B virus in 1967 and then two years later developed the first hepatitis B vaccine. Each year, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization recognize the day to help raise awareness about hepatitis, which impacts over 300 million across the globe and causes more than one million deaths a year.
Earlier in the month, I discussed a bit about the proposed traceability rules that may be coming out soon. One result of implementing the proposed rule and improving overall food traceability in your operation is the ability of those in the food chain to quickly identify and pull product involved in a food recall.
In June, I discussed the importance of having a solid food defense plan, and I provided you some resources for developing or strengthening your food defense plan. As I was writing those blogs, my mind kept turning toward food traceability. While they are distinctly different concepts, food traceability goes hand-in-hand with a food defense program. I would argue for your food defense plan to be effective, you must have an effective internal food traceability program, where you can trace the product back to the supplier (backward traceability), but also be able to trace the product from the supplier to the guest who was served the product (forward traceability).
Earlier in the month, I discussed the importance of having a solid food defense plan in place for your foodservice operation. Even if the first version of your plan is not perfect, it is a start. Having plans down on paper will force you to think through the process and ensure the vulnerable points where opportunities exist for possible contamination within the operation are mitigated.
