Print PDF

Calibrating More Than Just Thermometers

While classic bimetallic-stemmed thermometers have largely given way to modern digital alternatives, the act of calibrating them remains a fundamental food safety ritual drilled into foodservice professionals from their first week on the job. However, if your kitchen’s verification strategy stops at thermometers, you leave significant blind spots in your food safety defense system.

Calibration is the process of configuring an instrument to produce results within an acceptable range. In a modern commercial kitchen, we rely on dozens of automated systems, mechanical components, and electronic meters to keep food safe and ensure sanitation compliance. If these systems drift off-target, the consequences can be disastrous. To achieve true operational control, operators must expand their scope and examine three frequently overlooked compliance areas: dish machines, chemical dispensers, and automated data loggers.

Whether you operate a high-temperature sanitizing or a low-temperature machine that uses chemical sanitizers, the built-in gauges are your only immediate window into compliance. The FDA Food Code requires that high-temperature final rinse cycles reach at least 180°F (or 165°F for stationary racks) to ensure the dishware’s surface reaches the required 160°F sanitizing threshold.

However, external mechanical temperature gauges on dish machines can easily lose calibration due to constant vibrations, scale buildup, and regular wear and tear. If a gauge displays 180°F but the water is hitting 172°F, you are inadvertently washing dishes in the danger zone. Verification requires secondary testing. Operators must regularly use single-use dishwasher testing labels that have been run through a full cycle to verify that the performance of the machine matches its readout.

In low-temperature dish machines, three-compartment sinks, and automated chemical dispensing systems, chemical concentration is a matter of balance. Too little chemical results in a failure to sanitize, leaving harmful pathogens behind. Too much chemical can result in chemical contamination of food contact surfaces, presenting a direct hazard to guests.

Automated wall-mounted chemical dispensers rely on small, internal metering tips to pull the precise ratio of water and concentrated chemical. Over time, chemical crystallization, water pressure fluctuations, and mineral buildup can alter these ratios. Relying solely on the dispenser to do its job without regular verification is a gamble. Dispensers must be checked against manual chemical test strips, and the delivery pumps must be adjusted if the parts-per-million (PPM) deviate from manufacturer and regulatory guidelines.

…these tasks depend heavily on your specific operation, including the volume of food you are pushing out, the exact type of equipment you use, and your production system…

As the industry shifts toward digital food safety management, automated Bluetooth and Wi-Fi data-loggers have become the gold standard for monitoring walk-in coolers, freezers, and hot-holding cabinets. These sensors provide incredible peace of mind by constantly tracking ambient temperatures and sending alerts if a unit fails. But technology is not infallible. Automated loggers require regular comparisons to ensure their internal software offset is reading correctly.

To ensure these critical checks do not fall through the cracks, operators should implement a Master Calibration Schedule. Tracking these moving parts requires structured organization rather than memory.

In my experience, there are certain things you need to handle daily, others you can tackle each week, and some that only need attention once a month. Keep in mind, though, that these tasks depend heavily on your specific operation, including the volume of food you are pushing out, the exact type of equipment you use, and your production system. While I know your time is valuable, taking a few hours to critically review your operation will yield massive rewards for your kitchen down the road.

Once you have your system in place, document everything in a centralized master logbook or within your digital operating platform. Record the date, the instrument identifier, the initial reading, any corrective actions taken, and the initials of the verifying employee. When a health inspector sees an organized, comprehensive calibration history that extends far beyond standard handheld probes, it signals a top-tier culture of food safety excellence. Risk Nothing.

READ MORE POSTS

Don’t Underestimate the Importance of Employee Health as we head into the Winter Months

Early this month, I ran across an article discussing an outbreak investigation in the Australian Capital Territory. The outbreak caused more than 200 people to fall ill and was one of the most widespread outbreak investigations in the history of the territory.  The cause was traced back to Norovirus, a virus I am sure you have heard us opine about in this blog before.

Exclusion and Restrictions: Understanding Employee Health and the Food Code

I received a call earlier in the month from a foodservice operator who suspected that one of their employees may have fallen ill and wondered if they had to send the employee home for the day.  Once I started to ask a few more questions, it became obvious that the operator wasn’t really in-tune with the food code requirements on restrictions or exclusions for employees who may not be feeling well.  Given that most operations are dealing with staff shortages currently and the fact that we are about to head into the fall and winter – when we tend to see an increase in upper respiratory and other illnesses, such as the flu - it seemed like a very timely and important topic for the blog this month.

Cross Contamination and the Surfaces that go Unnoticed

In October, I ran across a new research study published in the Journal of Food Protection in early-September.  The article explored cross contamination in consumer kitchens during meal preparation. One of the authors was a previous SafeBites presenter, Dr. Ellen Shumaker, at North Carolina State University.  Although the setting was consumer kitchens and not the commercial kitchen many of you deal with daily, the findings were very applicable to what we often see in the foodservice setting.