Why Canning in Foodservice Really Isn’t a Good Way to Preserve Fresh Produce
Canning has long been a trusted method for preserving fresh produce, offering a way to extend shelf life and minimize waste. I grew up canning garden produce at home with my family and to do this day, I still can salsas, meat broths, pickles, and other tomato products for home use. In fact, it is a hobby of mine that I enjoy undertaking – much to the chagrin of my wife who simply tolerates my obsession to find new, interesting, and safe canning recipes.
Canning has had a resurgence of sorts in the past few years. Thousands of videos online address the topic and fueled by the supply chain disruptions and rising food prices we’ve seen since the pandemic in 2020, canning has become a popular activity once again. Home canning is a great activity – it allows individuals to preserve the produce they grow or buy locally, reduces dependence on store-bought goods, gives you greater control over your food supply and what goes into it, and fosters a sense of independence and preparedness.
That said, home canning should stay just that way – in the home. In a foodservice environment, we’ve seen increased interest in this among chefs and managers as they look to make use of farm-to-table or farm-to-school programs. While it may be ideal for home operations, canning fresh produce in a foodservice setting is often impractical and can lead to inefficiencies and safety risks.
Canning is very labor-intensive, requiring multiple steps. Once you have the produce in the operation, you must wash it, process it, sterilize your jars, prepare the product, fill the jars, and then finally process. Then, once you finish processing you realize that some of your jars didn’t seal, and all that work was for naught! In a foodservice environment where efficiency is paramount, dedicating staff hours to such a tedious process can disrupt operations. Instead of focusing on food preparation and service, staff would be tied up with canning, reducing overall productivity and profitability.
Most importantly, canning carries inherent food safety risks. Improper canning can lead to botulism, a serious and potentially fatal illness caused by the bacterium Clostridium botulinum. Even a small amount of botulinum toxin can make someone ill because the toxin is so potent. Ensuring safe canning practices requires rigorous adherence to tested methods, proper acidity levels, and precise processing times. There’s little room for error, and the stakes are too high if safety protocols are compromised.
From a regulatory standpoint, home canned foods are not allowed in school meal programs per USDA FNS guidelines. If you are another retail foodservice operation, you can only partake in this type of food preservation methods with the approval of your regulatory authority. At the very least, the FDA model food code would require that you have a fully functional HACCP plan in place to receive a variance to engage in this method of food preservation.
In closing, I am a big proponent of home canned food and encourage everyone to try it at least once…at home being the key phrase. But it is a different story in a foodservice operation where you are serving hundreds, if not thousands of guests daily. Hopefully, this discussion will quell your desire to implement canning in your foodservice operation. While canning may seem like a great marketing ploy and a way to preserve fresh produce, it is far from ideal in the foodservice industry. The time, labor, and safety risks associated with canning far outweigh its benefits for a commercial operation. Risk Nothing.
Call out: Most importantly, canning carries inherent food safety risks…there’s little room for error, and the stakes are too high if safety protocols are compromised.
Was that last 24 Hour “Bug” You Had Really a Foodborne Illness in Disguise?
Within this blog, I have discussed many foodborne pathogens: E. coli, Hepatitis, Salmonella, Listeria monocytogenes, and Campylobacter. But we’ve somehow managed to omit Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus).
30 Years Later: The Foodborne Illness Outbreak that Changed Food Safety
In January, we hit a major anniversary. One I am betting snuck by many of you – including me! January marked 30 years since the deadly 1993 E. coli O157:H7 outbreak at Jack in the Box restaurants on the west coast. The anniversary wasn’t on any of the major news networks that I recall. It did make it into a few newspapers, at least one or two of the newspapers that are left. It wasn’t until late-February that I realized it.
Does Temperature Really Matter when Washing your Hands?
In January, I reviewed the changes to the 2022 Food Code in my blog (check out Part I and Part II), and one change to the food code that I had mentioned, but didn’t discuss in-depth, was the change that lowered the water temperature a hand sink was required to produce to 85°F, as noted in Section 2-202.12 of the code. This requirement has been in place since the publishing of the 2001 Food Code, which required a water temperature of 100°F. Prior to this, 110°F was required (see the 1999 Food Code). So why the change and does water temperature when washing your hands really matter?
Hand sinks: Often Taken for Granted, but an Essential Part to Effective Hand Hygiene
Late in January, I received a question about hand sinks in a foodservice operation. The question pertained to school staff (teachers and aides) who were using a hand washing sink in the school kitchen. The question came as a matter of who was allowed access to the kitchen to use the sink, but the question itself caused me to go down a rabbit hole of requirements for hand washing sinks in foodservice operations.