Why Canning in Foodservice Really Isn’t a Good Way to Preserve Fresh Produce

Canning has long been a trusted method for preserving fresh produce, offering a way to extend shelf life and minimize waste. I grew up canning garden produce at home with my family and to do this day, I still can salsas, meat broths, pickles, and other tomato products for home use. In fact, it is a hobby of mine that I enjoy undertaking – much to the chagrin of my wife who simply tolerates my obsession to find new, interesting, and safe canning recipes.

 

Canning has had a resurgence of sorts in the past few years. Thousands of videos online address the topic and fueled by the supply chain disruptions and rising food prices we’ve seen since the pandemic in 2020, canning has become a popular activity once again. Home canning is a great activity – it allows individuals to preserve the produce they grow or buy locally, reduces dependence on store-bought goods, gives you greater control over your food supply and what goes into it, and fosters a sense of independence and preparedness.

 

That said, home canning should stay just that way – in the home. In a foodservice environment, we’ve seen increased interest in this among chefs and managers as they look to make use of farm-to-table or farm-to-school programs. While it may be ideal for home operations, canning fresh produce in a foodservice setting is often impractical and can lead to inefficiencies and safety risks.

 

Canning is very labor-intensive, requiring multiple steps. Once you have the produce in the operation, you must wash it, process it, sterilize your jars, prepare the product, fill the jars, and then finally process. Then, once you finish processing you realize that some of your jars didn’t seal, and all that work was for naught! In a foodservice environment where efficiency is paramount, dedicating staff hours to such a tedious process can disrupt operations. Instead of focusing on food preparation and service, staff would be tied up with canning, reducing overall productivity and profitability.

 

Most importantly, canning carries inherent food safety risks. Improper canning can lead to botulism, a serious and potentially fatal illness caused by the bacterium Clostridium botulinum. Even a small amount of botulinum toxin can make someone ill because the toxin is so potent. Ensuring safe canning practices requires rigorous adherence to tested methods, proper acidity levels, and precise processing times. There’s little room for error, and the stakes are too high if safety protocols are compromised.

 

From a regulatory standpoint, home canned foods are not allowed in school meal programs per USDA FNS guidelines. If you are another retail foodservice operation, you can only partake in this type of food preservation methods with the approval of your regulatory authority. At the very least, the FDA model food code would require that you have a fully functional HACCP plan in place to receive a variance to engage in this method of food preservation.

 

In closing, I am a big proponent of home canned food and encourage everyone to try it at least once…at home being the key phrase. But it is a different story in a foodservice operation where you are serving hundreds, if not thousands of guests daily. Hopefully, this discussion will quell your desire to implement canning in your foodservice operation. While canning may seem like a great marketing ploy and a way to preserve fresh produce, it is far from ideal in the foodservice industry. The time, labor, and safety risks associated with canning far outweigh its benefits for a commercial operation. Risk Nothing.

 

Call out: Most importantly, canning carries inherent food safety risks…there’s little room for error, and the stakes are too high if safety protocols are compromised.

Meat Color and Doneness: Persistent Pinking

Late in June, my family and I were able to visit the Black Hills, an area of the country in which I have not had the opportunity to spend much time.  One evening, as we dined at a local restaurant, I observed a table across the dining room sending back a dinner.  While I couldn’t hear the entire conversation and I certainly wasn’t trying to eavesdrop, it was apparent that the customer was unhappy with the cooking of their hamburger and was sending it back because it was too pink in the middle.  That immediately brought to my mind the phenomenon known as persistent pinking.  A term I became familiar with because of work done by some colleagues here at Kansas State, which they present each summer to a group of foodservice operators who join us on-campus for an in-depth week-long look at all things food safety.

Quat Binding – Why this Can Have a Disastrous Impact on Your Sanitation Program.

In June, I had the opportunity to represent FoodHandler and speak on food safety behavior for customers of Martin Bros. Distributing in Waterloo, Iowa.  One of the questions that was asked caught me a little off guard. The question was about quat binding.  It caught me off guard not because it was a bad question, but only because it was not something I had previously been asked nor had not yet been exposed to the phenomenon. However, I soon learned that in certain jurisdictions, it is resulting in changes to how sanitizing cloths are to be stored in sanitizing buckets (or not) in the foodservice industry. When I returned home from the trip, I had to dig into it to learn about what quat binding is and how it might impact foodservice operations.

Are Grades for Foodservice Inspections a Good Idea?

I generally try to stay away from controversial topics in my blog, but this is one I thought it might be interesting to discuss. Occasionally on my travels, I will come across a state or a local jurisdiction that requires foodservice inspection scores be posted in the window of the establishment.  The idea is to allow would-be customers the ability to see how the foodservice operation in which they are about to eat scored on their latest health inspection.