What Foodservice Professionals Need to Know about the FDA Milk Testing Changes
In late-April and early-May 2025, headlines across the country and several social media posts stirred concern after reports surfaced that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had temporarily suspended part of its milk testing program. For foodservice operators, this raises an important question: does this change compromise the safety of milk—and by extension, dairy products served in commercial kitchens, cafeterias, and restaurants?
To clarify, the FDA did not stop testing milk for safety. The agency temporarily paused its milk proficiency testing program, which is designed to evaluate and certify the laboratories that conduct routine safety testing on milk. While the pause raised public alarm, the FDA emphasized it continues to test milk for contaminants like antibiotics, pathogens, and chemical residues. Milk sold across the country still undergoes rigorous testing through state-level and industry systems. As such, milk continues to be inspected and tested by regulatory authorities, just as it has been for the last century.
…from a safety standpoint, milk remains one of the most closely monitored food products in the United States.
From a safety standpoint, milk remains one of the most closely monitored food products in the United States. While I was in grad school, I had a professor who noted that the milk we pour in a foodservice or in our homes has been tested upwards of 15 different times before we consume it. As such, I think it is safe to say that foodservice operators can still rely on their dairy suppliers and regulatory bodies to maintain strict safety standards. However, public perception is just as important as the truth.
Consumer trust is a major pillar of food safety, and news headlines, even when misinterpreted, can erode that trust. For operators in schools, hospitals, and other institutions serving vulnerable populations, even a temporary perception of risk can lead to questions, concern, or changes in purchasing behavior.
Foodservice managers may find themselves fielding questions from staff or customers who have heard about the testing pause. It’s important to be proactive by educating your team members and, if appropriate, providing signage or statements that clarify the milk supply remains safe.
Now is also a good time to check in with your dairy vendors. Ask for updated safety protocols or third-party certifications. Transparency from suppliers helps reinforce your own credibility with customers and regulatory bodies.
While the FDA’s testing changes are not a direct threat, they’re a reminder that internal milk and dairy handling protocols should follow the food code and your established SOPs. Ensure cold chain practices, date labeling, and storage procedures are up to standard.
This one instance helps to illustrate just how easily regulatory changes, even temporary ones, can impact perception. Foodservice operations should include regulatory communication risks in their crisis planning. A prepared response helps maintain calm, trust, and consistency.
Although the FDA’s milk proficiency testing pause isn’t cause for alarm, it serves as a valuable case study in food safety communication and preparedness. For foodservice operations: stay informed, stay transparent, and be ready to reinforce confidence, not just in your dairy products and food, but in your entire safety culture. Risk Nothing.
Don’t Turn a Blind Eye to Your Food Defense Practices
Late last week, as I mindlessly scrolled through Twitter, I ran across a Tweet suggesting the #IceCreamChallenge from summer 2019 was the real cause of the Coronavirus spread. Of course, the Tweet was made tongue in cheek, but it did cause me to reflect on that challenge, which had a short life on social media in the summer of 2019.
Salmonella and Listeria monocytogenes: Serious Threats to the Safety of Food
Earlier in the month, I mentioned the top microbial enemies we all face in foodservice operations, E. coli, Campylobacter, Salmonella, and Listeria monocytogenes. While we discussed E. coli and Campylobacter, we did not get around to discussing Salmonella or Listeria monocytogenes.
E. coli, Campylobacter, Salmonella, and Listeria monocytogenes…oh my!
Last month, I blogged a bit about the human factor in food safety. In the foodservice management realm, I do think the human factor is our biggest challenge, day in, day out. While the human factor is a major contributor to most foodborne illness outbreaks, we can’t forget about the microbial enemy we face on a daily basis.
The Human Factor and Food Safety
A few weeks ago, we discussed the top five causes of foodborne illness, 1) Improper hot/cold holding temperatures of time and temperature control for safety foods; 2) Improper cooking temperatures of food; 3) Dirty and/or contaminated utensils and equipment; 4) Poor employee health and hygiene; and 5) Food from unsafe sources. As I noted, all of these items are not in the direct control of your staff, but most can be. For the second blog this month, I wanted to discuss a bit more about the human factor in our food safety programs.