What Foodservice Professionals Need to Know about the FDA Milk Testing Changes
In late-April and early-May 2025, headlines across the country and several social media posts stirred concern after reports surfaced that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had temporarily suspended part of its milk testing program. For foodservice operators, this raises an important question: does this change compromise the safety of milk—and by extension, dairy products served in commercial kitchens, cafeterias, and restaurants?
To clarify, the FDA did not stop testing milk for safety. The agency temporarily paused its milk proficiency testing program, which is designed to evaluate and certify the laboratories that conduct routine safety testing on milk. While the pause raised public alarm, the FDA emphasized it continues to test milk for contaminants like antibiotics, pathogens, and chemical residues. Milk sold across the country still undergoes rigorous testing through state-level and industry systems. As such, milk continues to be inspected and tested by regulatory authorities, just as it has been for the last century.
…from a safety standpoint, milk remains one of the most closely monitored food products in the United States.
From a safety standpoint, milk remains one of the most closely monitored food products in the United States. While I was in grad school, I had a professor who noted that the milk we pour in a foodservice or in our homes has been tested upwards of 15 different times before we consume it. As such, I think it is safe to say that foodservice operators can still rely on their dairy suppliers and regulatory bodies to maintain strict safety standards. However, public perception is just as important as the truth.
Consumer trust is a major pillar of food safety, and news headlines, even when misinterpreted, can erode that trust. For operators in schools, hospitals, and other institutions serving vulnerable populations, even a temporary perception of risk can lead to questions, concern, or changes in purchasing behavior.
Foodservice managers may find themselves fielding questions from staff or customers who have heard about the testing pause. It’s important to be proactive by educating your team members and, if appropriate, providing signage or statements that clarify the milk supply remains safe.
Now is also a good time to check in with your dairy vendors. Ask for updated safety protocols or third-party certifications. Transparency from suppliers helps reinforce your own credibility with customers and regulatory bodies.
While the FDA’s testing changes are not a direct threat, they’re a reminder that internal milk and dairy handling protocols should follow the food code and your established SOPs. Ensure cold chain practices, date labeling, and storage procedures are up to standard.
This one instance helps to illustrate just how easily regulatory changes, even temporary ones, can impact perception. Foodservice operations should include regulatory communication risks in their crisis planning. A prepared response helps maintain calm, trust, and consistency.
Although the FDA’s milk proficiency testing pause isn’t cause for alarm, it serves as a valuable case study in food safety communication and preparedness. For foodservice operations: stay informed, stay transparent, and be ready to reinforce confidence, not just in your dairy products and food, but in your entire safety culture. Risk Nothing.
Be Proactive and Don’t End Up in Food Safety Jail!
Ok, I admit – there really is no food safety jail. But there is jail and, while it is uncommon, you can be sent there for not practicing food safety. Just the other day, I ran across a news report about two individuals in Wales who were sent to jail (albeit a suspended sentence) for “failing to take action to protect food from the risk of contamination; placing unsafe food on the market; failing to comply with a Remedial Action Notice and operating the business without approval after permission to supply seafood was suspended.”
Was that last 24 Hour “Bug” You Had Really a Foodborne Illness in Disguise?
Within this blog, I have discussed many foodborne pathogens: E. coli, Hepatitis, Salmonella, Listeria monocytogenes, and Campylobacter. But we’ve somehow managed to omit Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus).
30 Years Later: The Foodborne Illness Outbreak that Changed Food Safety
In January, we hit a major anniversary. One I am betting snuck by many of you – including me! January marked 30 years since the deadly 1993 E. coli O157:H7 outbreak at Jack in the Box restaurants on the west coast. The anniversary wasn’t on any of the major news networks that I recall. It did make it into a few newspapers, at least one or two of the newspapers that are left. It wasn’t until late-February that I realized it.
Does Temperature Really Matter when Washing your Hands?
In January, I reviewed the changes to the 2022 Food Code in my blog (check out Part I and Part II), and one change to the food code that I had mentioned, but didn’t discuss in-depth, was the change that lowered the water temperature a hand sink was required to produce to 85°F, as noted in Section 2-202.12 of the code. This requirement has been in place since the publishing of the 2001 Food Code, which required a water temperature of 100°F. Prior to this, 110°F was required (see the 1999 Food Code). So why the change and does water temperature when washing your hands really matter?