Risk-Based Inspections–Risk Nothing®
Every day we make decisions that have a risk component—what happens if we do something and what happens if we don’t? While some of you may be risk takers in some parts of life, risks related to food safety should not be taken because the consequences are too great—the possibility of a foodborne illness causing customers to get sick, and maybe even die, not to mention the negative publicity for the operation. For those of you who read our blogs routinely, you know that we always end with the FoodHandler tagline—Risk Nothing.
In recent years, you probably have noticed a shift in the approach that environmental health specialists are taking with your routine health inspections. Today, most are conducting what are called risk-based inspections. In other words, they are focusing on food handling behaviors that are most likely to cause a foodborne illness, rather than focusing on whether ventilation hoods are in place. You probably have noticed inspectors taking a lot more food temperatures than in the past! Why? Well because it is clear that temperatures are critical when the five broad categories of risk factors that lead to foodborne illness are considered:
- Food from unsafe sources
- Inadequate cooking
- Improper holding temperatures
- Contaminated equipment
- Poor personal hygiene
As a follower of this blog, you may be tired of us continually pointing these out! But it is important to know the risks in order to take precautions.
These categories were identified by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention based on investigations of the causes of foodborne illnesses. Because they are evidence based, they serve as the foundation for risk-based inspections. If you would like to read more about risk-based inspections, there is an entire section (Annex 5) describing the approach in the FDA Food Code.
During an inspection, inspectors are looking for signs of active managerial control. You may remember that we addressed that subject in an earlier blog . It is only through active managerial control—something that needs to happen on a daily basis—that providing safe food occurs. Inspectors are in operations one or two times a year and they can point out issues, but managers are in the operation almost every day, so it is the responsibility of those in charge to have a comprehensive food safety system that includes continuous monitoring and engages everyone.
We want you to think like an inspector every time you walk into your kitchen! One of the things that the inspector should do early in a visit is to review the menu and preparation procedures. This review identifies high-risk foods (those that are temperature controlled for safety or TCS foods) and complex operational steps that might create a food safety concern. High-risk foods might be items such as poultry, seafood, or ground beef handled from the raw state, or fresh produce items that do not receive a cooking step. An example of a complex process would be a cook-chill item—that occurs when you prepare a food, chill it, and then reheat it when it is ordered from the menu. Going through the heating process requires more trips through the temperature danger zone and that creates a food safety concern because there are increased opportunities for bacterial growth to reach harmful levels. Correct procedures need to be followed for cooking to minimum internal temperature, cooling following the two stage process outlined in the Food Code, and then reheating to at least 165 oF. So, look at your menu and processes and identify the items that you want to make sure you monitor in your operation. If ground beef crumbles were prepared in advance, the beef would be cooked to at least 155 oF, and cooled to below 70 oF within two hours and below 41 oF in an additional four. Once those crumbles are used in a menu item, the items must be reheated to at least 165 oF. Temperatures throughout the process should be documented.
We have developed a SafeFood checklist to help you identify areas in your operation that should be monitored regularly. Think of this checklist as a short version of the risk-based inspection form used by the health inspectors. Our second blog for August will introduce the checklist for the back of the house. We encourage the persons in charge AND staff to become familiar with this tool.
Remember, every action taken to reduce the risk of foodborne illness in your operation just makes good business sense. Having standard operating procedures, training employees on those procedures, and having an on-going process for monitoring critical areas provides the infrastructure for the system. FoodHandler has resources to help! Risk nothing!
Meat Color and Doneness: Persistent Pinking
Late in June, my family and I were able to visit the Black Hills, an area of the country in which I have not had the opportunity to spend much time. One evening, as we dined at a local restaurant, I observed a table across the dining room sending back a dinner. While I couldn’t hear the entire conversation and I certainly wasn’t trying to eavesdrop, it was apparent that the customer was unhappy with the cooking of their hamburger and was sending it back because it was too pink in the middle. That immediately brought to my mind the phenomenon known as persistent pinking. A term I became familiar with because of work done by some colleagues here at Kansas State, which they present each summer to a group of foodservice operators who join us on-campus for an in-depth week-long look at all things food safety.
Quat Binding – Why this Can Have a Disastrous Impact on Your Sanitation Program.
In June, I had the opportunity to represent FoodHandler and speak on food safety behavior for customers of Martin Bros. Distributing in Waterloo, Iowa. One of the questions that was asked caught me a little off guard. The question was about quat binding. It caught me off guard not because it was a bad question, but only because it was not something I had previously been asked nor had not yet been exposed to the phenomenon. However, I soon learned that in certain jurisdictions, it is resulting in changes to how sanitizing cloths are to be stored in sanitizing buckets (or not) in the foodservice industry. When I returned home from the trip, I had to dig into it to learn about what quat binding is and how it might impact foodservice operations.
Are Grades for Foodservice Inspections a Good Idea?
I generally try to stay away from controversial topics in my blog, but this is one I thought it might be interesting to discuss. Occasionally on my travels, I will come across a state or a local jurisdiction that requires foodservice inspection scores be posted in the window of the establishment. The idea is to allow would-be customers the ability to see how the foodservice operation in which they are about to eat scored on their latest health inspection.
Neglected Safety: CDC Report Casts Doubts on the Ability of the Foodservice Industry to Ensure Ill Workers Stay at Home
Early in June, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released a report outlining foodborne illness outbreaks in retail foodservice establishments. The report outlined outbreaks from 25 state and local health departments from 2017 through 2019.
