Print PDF

Is a Written Health Policy Right for your Foodservice Operation?

Last month, we introduced you to the foodborne pathogens every foodservice employee should know by name: Norovirus, Hepatitis A, Salmonella Typhi, Shigella, E. coli, and Salmonella. We talked about how they spread, what makes each one dangerous, and why understanding the basics of those is important for those who work in, or manage, foodservice operations. If you haven’t read that post yet, it’s worth going back to check it out.

In this blog, we’re taking the next logical step: what does your operation actually do with that knowledge? Because knowing which pathogens to be concerned with is only half the equation. The other half is having a documented, enforceable system that keeps infected employees from bringing those pathogens into your kitchen in the first place. That system has a name in the FDA Food Code, and it is referred to in §2-201. It’s called the Written Employee Health Policy.

There’s a scene that plays out in kitchens across America every single day. A line cook comes in looking a little pale. Maybe they have a stomach bug. Maybe they threw up the night before. They know they’re sick, but they come in anyway. Afterall, they need the paycheck, they don’t want to let the team down, and because nobody ever told them clearly that working sick can be a food code violation. A written Employee Health Policy is the document that closes that gap, and if you don’t have one, today is the day to fix that.

First things, first though. Is a written health policy required in the code. Here is where it is again important to check your local jurisdiction’s requirements, but as far as the 2022 Model Food Code, no, it is not required! What is required is that the permit holder ensure employees report covered symptoms and diagnoses to the person in charge, and that the person in charge act on those reports through exclusion or restriction. The code mandates the system, that is the reporting, the restriction, the exclusion, but it does not use the word “written” in describing the policy itself. However, a verbal policy is unenforceable, inconsistently applied, and leaves you with no evidence of compliance when something goes wrong. The written policy protects you as much as it protects your customers.

The FDA Food Code’s employee health provisions exist because sick food workers are one of the leading causes of foodborne illness outbreaks in the United States. The pathogens we discussed in our previous blog were chosen specifically because they can be shed in feces, saliva, or vomit, and can be transmitted directly to food through contaminated hands, surfaces, or respiratory droplets. These aren’t theoretical risks; they are the documented causes of some of the most devastating foodservice-associated outbreaks on record.

 

…these pathogens share a critical characteristic: infected individuals can transmit the organism to food before they feel sick, while they’re symptomatic, and in some cases even after symptoms are resolved…

That’s exactly why a proactive, written health policy, not reactive, not informal policy, is the only approach that works. In conversations with operators over many years, a few common reasons come up for why the written health policy gets neglected:

  • “We communicate it verbally at orientation.”
    • Verbal communication is not documented communication. If an employee claims they didn’t know the reporting requirements and causes an outbreak, “we told them verbally” is not a defensible position.
  • “We handle it case by case.”
    • Case-by-case management invites inconsistency, favoritism, and failure. A written policy ensures the same standards apply to the part-time server as to the long-term cook.
  • “We don’t want to penalize employees for being sick.”
    • This is a legitimate concern, but the solution isn’t to skip the policy. A better solution would be to pair the policy with an adequate sick leave structure. Employees don’t come into work ill because they don’t care about food safety; they come to work while they are ill because they can’t afford to stay home.
  • “It’s too complicated.”
    • The core requirements can fit on two pages. Simplicity is achievable.

The legal exposure here is significant. If an employee causes a foodborne illness outbreak and your establishment cannot produce a written health policy, one that the employee signed acknowledging they understood their reporting obligations, you are in a vulnerable position during any regulatory investigation or civil litigation.

So, the real answer…the only answer…to if a written health policy is right for your operation is an unequivocal yes! Not a light yes, or a “sometimes” yes, a strong, resounding YES! Section 2-201 of the FDA Food Code exists because sick food workers cause outbreaks, outbreaks cause illness and death, and the food industry has a legal and moral obligation to prevent them. The written employee health policy is one of the most powerful tools you have to fulfill that obligation. Check back in with our next blog and we will discuss some strategies to craft a policy that works for you and your foodservice operation. Risk Nothing.

READ MORE POSTS

30 Years Later: The Foodborne Illness Outbreak that Changed Food Safety

In January, we hit a major anniversary.  One I am betting snuck by many of you – including me! January marked 30 years since the deadly 1993 E. coli O157:H7 outbreak at Jack in the Box restaurants on the west coast. The anniversary wasn’t on any of the major news networks that I recall. It did make it into a few newspapers, at least one or two of the newspapers that are left.  It wasn’t until late-February that I realized it.

Does Temperature Really Matter when Washing your Hands?

In January, I reviewed the changes to the 2022 Food Code in my blog (check out Part I and Part II), and one change to the food code that I had mentioned, but didn’t discuss in-depth, was the change that lowered the water temperature a hand sink was required to produce to 85°F, as noted in Section 2-202.12 of the code. This requirement has been in place since the publishing of the 2001 Food Code, which required a water temperature of 100°F. Prior to this, 110°F was required (see the 1999 Food Code). So why the change and does water temperature when washing your hands really matter?

Hand sinks: Often Taken for Granted, but an Essential Part to Effective Hand Hygiene

Late in January, I received a question about hand sinks in a foodservice operation.  The question pertained to school staff (teachers and aides) who were using a hand washing sink in the school kitchen.  The question came as a matter of who was allowed access to the kitchen to use the sink, but the question itself caused me to go down a rabbit hole of requirements for hand washing sinks in foodservice operations.