Food Packaging Safety in a Vacuum

bagsExtending the shelf life of fresh foods has come a long way in the food industry since curing meats with salt and sugar or canning vegetables with heat processing. The food service and consumer markets needed some better visual packages to draw the eye to the freshness factor and the technology of food packaging has filled our dinner plate. Vacuum packaging and modified atmosphere packaging, shortened to “MAP”, are the terms used for the method of food packaging used every time we choose convenience over more complex scratch meal preparation. According to industry statistics, billions of packages of vacuum and MAP-packaged foods flood the marketplace today. In both modified-atmosphere and vacuum packaging, food is packaged in a pouch made of barrier film.

  • In modified-atmosphere packaging, the headspace (vacant area) of the pouch is flushed with gases that prolong the shelf life of the item.
  • In vacuum packaging, air in the headspace is vacuumed out, extending shelf life by preventing oxidation and inhibiting microbial growth. Thicker, high-barrier films used in the vacuum packaging process restrict the passage of gases.
  • Cold holding at 41°F or below is always required as a food safety barrier for potentially hazardous foods in this specialized packaging, unless the food is acidified by the commercial food processor.

MAP packaging allows processors and distributors to provide food that is fresh, convenient, and often less labor-intensive than traditional foods. The leader in the MAP foods category is fresh, ready-to-use vegetables, such as bags of pre-trimmed, pre-washed salad greens, or packages of washed, sliced mushrooms. Or, consider dip-ready celery sticks, mini carrots, and broccoli. Other examples of popular MAP foods include the combination cheese and cracker snacks, fresh pasta, soups, sauces, fresh pizzas, grated cheese, sandwiches, and meats.

MAP Convenience & Food Safety vs. Labor Cost — Like general consumers, foodservice operations enjoy the convenience of MAP foods. Quick service restaurants were the early users of MAP packaged lettuce. Some foodservice managers compare the added cost of buying pre-prepped vegetables with the labor cost of in-house prep. They choose “ready” produce as a way to contain the budget and extend productivity of the crew. A huge food safety benefit is in there too. Less hands preparing and portioning MAP foods might lower the risk of contaminating ready-to-eat foods. At home, the average consumer spends 2 ½ hours less today than a few decades ago in the task of meal preparation. That’s good for the food service industry. MAP foods not only save prep time, but they also last longer in the refrigerator. In all, MAP packaging boosts storage life by two-to-five times.

FDA Regulations for Reduced Oxygen Packaging—Here’s a few more acrynoms and warnings. The FDA Food Code has very specific requirements on MAP and vacuum packaging in Chapter 3-502 and refers to the process as “reduced oxygen packaging (ROP).” A HACCP (Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point) plan with at least two barriers to prevent microbial growth is required to use reduced oxygen packaging. Packaging might even prove a life-or-death issue.  For example, fresh fish cannot be packaged using MAP because of the concerns for formation of Botulism toxin or growth of Listeria monocytogenes – both potent foodborne pathogens. FDA regulations dictate packaging in a pouch labeled for a very specific oxygen-transmission rate. Putting certain products in an unsuitable film with a lower-than-specified oxygen-transmission rate, such as those used for beef and pork, could allow toxic microbial growth. Food manufacturers have that technology and restaurants typically do not.  For regulatory details, read this section of the Food Code:  http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~acrobat/fc05-3.pdf

What exactly is MAP packaging? In this process, a mixture of gases replaces the ordinary air in the food package. No magic recipe dictates the gas mix. Instead, food technologists decide on a mix and packaging solution for each individual product. In itself, applying MAP technology is a science. Three gases used in MAP are: carbon dioxide, nitrogen, and — on a limited basis — oxygen. In general, technologists use the carbon dioxide to replace oxygen.  This creates a low-oxygen environment, where many foodborne pathogens cannot thrive. The low-oxygen environment also inhibits spoilage by preventing growth of molds and yeasts. Nitrogen likewise serves to displace oxygen. It’s also a “filler” gas. For example, a package of salad needs to stay “puffed up” to protect fragile greens. Nitrogen helps maintain this mechanical protection. Oxygen enters the picture as a way to improve food appearance and typically appears in a MAP food at a proportion of 1-5%.  Red meats, for example, need some oxygen to look red and appeal to consumers.

Bottom Line:  Shelf-stable prepared products increasingly play a significant role in every aspect of the food industry. This packaging technology has gone a long way to improve our food safety, quality, and convenience and lessen food waste.   

***

About the Author: Lacie Thrall

Lacie Thrall PictureLacie Thrall passed away in early 2017 after a long illness. She dedicated her 35-year career to improving the health and well-being of others by promoting food safety best practices. Lacie worked in environmental health for 17 years before joining FoodHandler in 1997 as the Director of Safety Management. While at FoodHandler, she trained employees and customers on safe food handling practices, including proper hand hygiene and glove use. Later as a FoodHandler consultant, Lacie provided the foodservice industry with food safety information and advice through her blog on FoodHandler.com.

 

This information is provided as a general guideline and is not intended to be, nor does it, constitute legal or regulatory advice. Additional Federal regulations may apply to your particular circumstances. State, regional and local laws, ordinances and regulations may also apply.

Meat Color and Doneness: Persistent Pinking

Late in June, my family and I were able to visit the Black Hills, an area of the country in which I have not had the opportunity to spend much time.  One evening, as we dined at a local restaurant, I observed a table across the dining room sending back a dinner.  While I couldn’t hear the entire conversation and I certainly wasn’t trying to eavesdrop, it was apparent that the customer was unhappy with the cooking of their hamburger and was sending it back because it was too pink in the middle.  That immediately brought to my mind the phenomenon known as persistent pinking.  A term I became familiar with because of work done by some colleagues here at Kansas State, which they present each summer to a group of foodservice operators who join us on-campus for an in-depth week-long look at all things food safety.

Quat Binding – Why this Can Have a Disastrous Impact on Your Sanitation Program.

In June, I had the opportunity to represent FoodHandler and speak on food safety behavior for customers of Martin Bros. Distributing in Waterloo, Iowa.  One of the questions that was asked caught me a little off guard. The question was about quat binding.  It caught me off guard not because it was a bad question, but only because it was not something I had previously been asked nor had not yet been exposed to the phenomenon. However, I soon learned that in certain jurisdictions, it is resulting in changes to how sanitizing cloths are to be stored in sanitizing buckets (or not) in the foodservice industry. When I returned home from the trip, I had to dig into it to learn about what quat binding is and how it might impact foodservice operations.

Are Grades for Foodservice Inspections a Good Idea?

I generally try to stay away from controversial topics in my blog, but this is one I thought it might be interesting to discuss. Occasionally on my travels, I will come across a state or a local jurisdiction that requires foodservice inspection scores be posted in the window of the establishment.  The idea is to allow would-be customers the ability to see how the foodservice operation in which they are about to eat scored on their latest health inspection.