Does Temperature Really Matter when Washing your Hands?
In January, I reviewed the changes to the 2022 Food Code in my blog (check out Part I and Part II), and one change to the food code that I had mentioned, but didn’t discuss in-depth, was the change that lowered the water temperature a hand sink was required to produce to 85°F, as noted in Section 2-202.12 of the code. This requirement has been in place since the publishing of the 2001 Food Code, which required a water temperature of 100°F. Prior to this, 110°F was required (see the 1999 Food Code). So why the change and does water temperature when washing your hands really matter?
The change started long before the 2022 edition was being developed. In 2010, the Conference for Food Protection had recommended changing the temperature to 85°F, but when the supplement to the 2009 Food Code was later released, the revision was not included.
As you look at the relationship between hand washing efficacy and water temperature…what we had always believed to be true was not supported by the research.
Growing up in the foodservice business, I had always heard the phrase “as hot as you can handle” when it came to the correct temperature to wash your hands. Many believe that the magical temperature at which hand washing should occur was 100°F. However, that is simply the water temperature that a hand washing sink should reach per the FDA Model Food Code, not necessarily the temperature at which you must wash your hands.
A few years ago, when we were getting ready to explore employee hand washing behavior as part of our research, this “requirement” came up as a discussion point among our research team as we were developing our observation rubrics. After digging into it, we realized that most resources online only said potable water, with no temperature requirement. Our team explored the websites of the Centers for Disease Control and World Health Organization and reviewed the food code to determine what was recommended and required. Outside of finding that food code required water at the sink to be a minimum of 100°F, there was no requirement to wash your hands at a certain temperature and no mention that a higher temperature was necessary.
The more we explored the topic, the more we found that what we had always believed to be true was not supported by the research. Michaels and his colleagues published data in 2001 that concluded that water temperature had no effect on the level of bacterial reduction when using nonantibacterial soap. A follow-up study published by Michaels and another group of researchers in 2002 found similar results, but also noted that the higher water temperatures resulted in skin irritation and loss of water content, a complaint that has often arisen as a frequent barrier to hand washing in the foodservice industry.
Temperature is important because we want out employees to be comfortable washing their hands, so warm water at the hand washing sink is important. But if water temperature is not important in bacterial reduction on the hands, what is? A quality soap, friction (time), and rinsing. Encourage your employees to do these steps and they can help protect your business and themselves from food handler contamination.
I must close with my usual disclaimer when talked about the updated food code – be sure to follow your local food code. Although the 2022 Model Food Code has been released, most jurisdictions are still operating on older versions of the code, and it is important to know the specific requirements in your area. Risk Nothing.
Flour Safety: Don’t Let E. coli become the Secret Ingredient in your Cake.
Earlier this month, we started to see information coming out about a foodborne illness outbreak from an unlikely source – flour. As of early-April, 12 people had fallen ill, and three people had been hospitalized as a result of flour contaminated with Salmonella. While the outbreak is still in its early stages, no individuals have died because of their illness. A specific source has not yet been identified in the outbreak, but all who have fallen ill have reported eating raw batter or dough due before developing symptoms – and flour has been identified as the only common ingredient in these batters and doughs.
Be Proactive and Don’t End Up in Food Safety Jail!
Ok, I admit – there really is no food safety jail. But there is jail and, while it is uncommon, you can be sent there for not practicing food safety. Just the other day, I ran across a news report about two individuals in Wales who were sent to jail (albeit a suspended sentence) for “failing to take action to protect food from the risk of contamination; placing unsafe food on the market; failing to comply with a Remedial Action Notice and operating the business without approval after permission to supply seafood was suspended.”
Was that last 24 Hour “Bug” You Had Really a Foodborne Illness in Disguise?
Within this blog, I have discussed many foodborne pathogens: E. coli, Hepatitis, Salmonella, Listeria monocytogenes, and Campylobacter. But we’ve somehow managed to omit Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus).
30 Years Later: The Foodborne Illness Outbreak that Changed Food Safety
In January, we hit a major anniversary. One I am betting snuck by many of you – including me! January marked 30 years since the deadly 1993 E. coli O157:H7 outbreak at Jack in the Box restaurants on the west coast. The anniversary wasn’t on any of the major news networks that I recall. It did make it into a few newspapers, at least one or two of the newspapers that are left. It wasn’t until late-February that I realized it.