Calibrating More Than Just Thermometers

While classic bimetallic-stemmed thermometers have largely given way to modern digital alternatives, the act of calibrating them remains a fundamental food safety ritual drilled into foodservice professionals from their first week on the job. However, if your kitchen’s verification strategy stops at thermometers, you leave significant blind spots in your food safety defense system.

Calibration is the process of configuring an instrument to produce results within an acceptable range. In a modern commercial kitchen, we rely on dozens of automated systems, mechanical components, and electronic meters to keep food safe and ensure sanitation compliance. If these systems drift off-target, the consequences can be disastrous. To achieve true operational control, operators must expand their scope and examine three frequently overlooked compliance areas: dish machines, chemical dispensers, and automated data loggers.

Whether you operate a high-temperature sanitizing or a low-temperature machine that uses chemical sanitizers, the built-in gauges are your only immediate window into compliance. The FDA Food Code requires that high-temperature final rinse cycles reach at least 180°F (or 165°F for stationary racks) to ensure the dishware’s surface reaches the required 160°F sanitizing threshold.

However, external mechanical temperature gauges on dish machines can easily lose calibration due to constant vibrations, scale buildup, and regular wear and tear. If a gauge displays 180°F but the water is hitting 172°F, you are inadvertently washing dishes in the danger zone. Verification requires secondary testing. Operators must regularly use single-use dishwasher testing labels that have been run through a full cycle to verify that the performance of the machine matches its readout.

In low-temperature dish machines, three-compartment sinks, and automated chemical dispensing systems, chemical concentration is a matter of balance. Too little chemical results in a failure to sanitize, leaving harmful pathogens behind. Too much chemical can result in chemical contamination of food contact surfaces, presenting a direct hazard to guests.

Automated wall-mounted chemical dispensers rely on small, internal metering tips to pull the precise ratio of water and concentrated chemical. Over time, chemical crystallization, water pressure fluctuations, and mineral buildup can alter these ratios. Relying solely on the dispenser to do its job without regular verification is a gamble. Dispensers must be checked against manual chemical test strips, and the delivery pumps must be adjusted if the parts-per-million (PPM) deviate from manufacturer and regulatory guidelines.

…these tasks depend heavily on your specific operation, including the volume of food you are pushing out, the exact type of equipment you use, and your production system…

As the industry shifts toward digital food safety management, automated Bluetooth and Wi-Fi data-loggers have become the gold standard for monitoring walk-in coolers, freezers, and hot-holding cabinets. These sensors provide incredible peace of mind by constantly tracking ambient temperatures and sending alerts if a unit fails. But technology is not infallible. Automated loggers require regular comparisons to ensure their internal software offset is reading correctly.

To ensure these critical checks do not fall through the cracks, operators should implement a Master Calibration Schedule. Tracking these moving parts requires structured organization rather than memory.

In my experience, there are certain things you need to handle daily, others you can tackle each week, and some that only need attention once a month. Keep in mind, though, that these tasks depend heavily on your specific operation, including the volume of food you are pushing out, the exact type of equipment you use, and your production system. While I know your time is valuable, taking a few hours to critically review your operation will yield massive rewards for your kitchen down the road.

Once you have your system in place, document everything in a centralized master logbook or within your digital operating platform. Record the date, the instrument identifier, the initial reading, any corrective actions taken, and the initials of the verifying employee. When a health inspector sees an organized, comprehensive calibration history that extends far beyond standard handheld probes, it signals a top-tier culture of food safety excellence. Risk Nothing.

Flour Safety: Don’t Let E. coli become the Secret Ingredient in your Cake.

Earlier this month, we started to see information coming out about a foodborne illness outbreak from an unlikely source – flour. As of early-April, 12 people had fallen ill, and three people had been hospitalized as a result of flour contaminated with Salmonella. While the outbreak is still in its early stages, no individuals have died because of their illness. A specific source has not yet been identified in the outbreak, but all who have fallen ill have reported eating raw batter or dough due before developing symptoms – and flour has been identified as the only common ingredient in these batters and doughs.

Be Proactive and Don’t End Up in Food Safety Jail!

Ok, I admit – there really is no food safety jail. But there is jail and, while it is uncommon, you can be sent there for not practicing food safety. Just the other day, I ran across a news report about two individuals in Wales who were sent to jail (albeit a suspended sentence) for “failing to take action to protect food from the risk of contamination; placing unsafe food on the market; failing to comply with a Remedial Action Notice and operating the business without approval after permission to supply seafood was suspended.”

Was that last 24 Hour “Bug” You Had Really a Foodborne Illness in Disguise?

Within this blog, I have discussed many foodborne pathogens: E. coli, Hepatitis, Salmonella, Listeria monocytogenes, and Campylobacter. But we’ve somehow managed to omit Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus).

30 Years Later: The Foodborne Illness Outbreak that Changed Food Safety

In January, we hit a major anniversary. One I am betting snuck by many of you – including me! January marked 30 years since the deadly 1993 E. coli O157:H7 outbreak at Jack in the Box restaurants on the west coast. The anniversary wasn’t on any of the major news networks that I recall. It did make it into a few newspapers, at least one or two of the newspapers that are left. It wasn’t until late-February that I realized it.