Building an Internal Food Safety Audit Process
I can’t speak for you all, but one of the moments I always hated in the day-in-the-life of a foodservice manager was when the inspector walked in and let me know he was there to conduct an inspection. Our inspector ate in our operation quite frequently, but it was when he had his clipboard in hand (yes, he came with a clipboard back then) that I knew he was there for business. At that moment, the “what ifs” always played havoc on my mind.
It was also at that moment that I hoped our staff in the back of the house would notice that our inspector was there and that he was starting his inspection. Hoping that they would make sure things are in line before he really got to the “meat” of the inspection.
Now, our inspections generally went well. We had a great relationship with our inspector and very few, if any, bad inspections. But looking back, I can see we were managing to the inspection, not to the standards we had established.
So how can you manage to the standards versus managing to the inspection? Well, first, make sure you have strong standards in place. Then, conduct self-inspections. Sure, you can hire companies that will come in and do food safety audits, or even consultants who will do it. But you can have your own staff conduct a self-audit of the facility.
Every health department conducts inspections using a standardized form, and most are modeled on or adapted from the FDA model inspection form. The form is organized around the same risk categories that the food code prioritizes: employee health and hygiene, time and temperature controls, cross-contamination prevention, chemical handling, and facility maintenance.
…The temptation with any self-assessment is to grade generously. Resist it. The value of this process lives entirely in its honesty…
You probably haven’t looked at this form outside of an actual inspection, but you should. Your first step is to get a copy and use it as the basis for your self-audit. Most jurisdictions post their inspection forms online. If yours doesn’t, call your local health department and ask; they will provide one. This is the document your inspector walks through item by item during every visit.
The form only works as a tool if you use it consistently. For most operations, a monthly self-audit is a reasonable starting point. Some high-volume or high-risk operations may benefit from weekly or even daily spot checks on the highest-priority items, such as temperature logs, handwashing compliance, and sanitizer concentrations.
Assign the audit to your designated person in charge (PIC) for that shift. This serves a dual purpose: it reinforces the PIC’s ownership of food safety compliance and builds the operational awareness that makes the PIC effective during an actual inspection. A PIC who regularly audits the operation knows where the vulnerabilities are, understands the follow-up questions an inspector might ask, and can confidently speak to corrective actions.
The temptation with any self-assessment is to grade generously. Resist it. The value of this process lives entirely in its honesty. If the walk-in cooler is running at 43°F instead of 41°F, mark it. If the three-compartment sink sanitizer concentration is low, mark it. If an employee can’t tell you when they’re required to wash their hands, mark it.
Document what you find the same way an inspector would. Write down the specific observation and the corrective action taken.
If you happen to notice trends in the data from self-audit to self-audit, that’s not a fluke. That’s a systems problem that needs a systems-level fix. Every finding needs a corrective action, a responsible person, and a timeline.
This is also where internal audits can help with training. If your audits consistently reveal employees are struggling with a particular requirement, use it as a signal that your training program needs attention in that area.
Health inspections aren’t pass-fail exams you cram for the night before. They’re snapshots of how your operation runs on any given day. The operators who consistently perform well are the ones who have made the inspection standard their everyday standard. Building a self-audit process is the most direct way to close that gap. It’s free, it’s practical, and it turns your PIC from someone who reacts to inspections into someone who’s already done the work before the inspector arrives. Risk Nothing.
READ MORE POSTS
Remembering the Importance of Food Safety During Food Safety Education Month
In the foodservice industry, every plate that leaves your kitchen carries not just flavors and aromas, but also the responsibility of providing safe and wholesome meals to customers. Celebrated each September, National Food Safety Education Month provides a platform for foodservice professionals to reaffirm their commitment to food safety. It's a reminder that excellence in foodservice operations must always be accompanied by excellence in food safety; a reminder that any great meal begins with safe food as the foundation.
Embracing Technology for Enhanced Food Safety in Foodservice Operations
Technology. We love it, we hate it. I’ve always been fascinated by technology; I remember getting my first Blackberry in the mid-90s and thinking it was the pinnacle of technological advances. Before that, I remember ordering a dictation program in college that was going to revolutionize the way I “typed” my assignments. Looking back, it really wasn’t worth the box that the program came in. Now, we have ChatGPT that will write the entire paper for us!
Meat Color and Doneness: Persistent Pinking
Late in June, my family and I were able to visit the Black Hills, an area of the country in which I have not had the opportunity to spend much time. One evening, as we dined at a local restaurant, I observed a table across the dining room sending back a dinner. While I couldn’t hear the entire conversation and I certainly wasn’t trying to eavesdrop, it was apparent that the customer was unhappy with the cooking of their hamburger and was sending it back because it was too pink in the middle. That immediately brought to my mind the phenomenon known as persistent pinking. A term I became familiar with because of work done by some colleagues here at Kansas State, which they present each summer to a group of foodservice operators who join us on-campus for an in-depth week-long look at all things food safety.
Quat Binding – Why this Can Have a Disastrous Impact on Your Sanitation Program.
In June, I had the opportunity to represent FoodHandler and speak on food safety behavior for customers of Martin Bros. Distributing in Waterloo, Iowa. One of the questions that was asked caught me a little off guard. The question was about quat binding. It caught me off guard not because it was a bad question, but only because it was not something I had previously been asked nor had not yet been exposed to the phenomenon. However, I soon learned that in certain jurisdictions, it is resulting in changes to how sanitizing cloths are to be stored in sanitizing buckets (or not) in the foodservice industry. When I returned home from the trip, I had to dig into it to learn about what quat binding is and how it might impact foodservice operations.
