UNDERSTANDING TIME AS A CONTROL FOR PUBLIC HEALTH
Much of our business that revolves around food safety is governed by temperatures. The endpoint cooking temperature of ground beef, the hot holding temperature on the line, the temperature of our refrigerators, or what the key temperatures are for cooling – the temperatures that many of us can recite in our sleep. But there are times when temperature control is just simply not possible. I remember several instances in my foodservice life where we didn’t have the luxury of having refrigeration, or where we were catering an outdoor event, and no matter how “windproof” our sternos and chaffing dishes were meant to be, the brisk Iowa wind would blow out the flame. This is where the food code section on time as a public health control comes into play.
Last week, I was helping with the development of a food safety exam, and I was reminded of just how confusing and misunderstood this section of the food code could be – for employees, managers, and seasoned professionals, alike. The code spells out this information in Section 3-501.19.
We all know that hot food must be kept at a temperature greater than 135˚F and cold food less than 41˚F, but at times when you are not able to maintain those temperatures, the code allows you to use time to keep food safe. To use this provision of the code, you do have to have a written procedure that you have prepared in advance, which can be made available to the inspector if they inquire about your procedures.
WE ALL KNOW THAT HOT FOOD MUST BE KEPT AT A TEMPERATURE GREATER THAN 135˚F OR LESS THAN 41˚F, BUT WHEN YOU ARE NOT ABLE TO MAINTAIN THOSE TEMPERATURES, THE CODE ALLOWS YOU TO USE TIME AS A MEASURE TO KEEP FOOD SAFE.
The next requirement is to make sure you have held the food properly at the correct temperature before you remove it from temperature control. In the case of hot food, it should be held at a temperature greater than 135˚F and cold food should have been kept at a temperature less than 41˚F.
Then, once it is removed from temperature control (for example, placed on a buffet line), record the time of when it was removed from temperature control and when it must be discarded. Once the four-hour mark has been reached, the food must have been served or discarded. It cannot be reheated to temperature and saved, or served again, it must be discarded.
There is, however, also a provision in the code that allows you to keep food for up to a maximum of six hours. This is only permissible for cold food (that is, food removed from temperature control at 41˚F or less). Again, the food shall be marked with the time at which it was removed from temperature control and the time at which the six-hour point will be met, at which point the food must be either served, cooked and served, or discarded. However, the food at no point shall exceed 70˚F during this six-hour period. Once the food exceeds the 70˚F point, it must be discarded.
Now for the usual disclaimer that I add at any time I discuss the food code. It is vital that you know your local food code and if the time as a public health control is allowed for in your specific jurisdiction and if there are any specific nuances that differs from the Model Food Code, which is what I base all of my blogs off, currently the 2022 code. Each jurisdiction has the ability to adopt any part of the model code or amend it to fit their standards, so when it doubt, call your inspector. Risk Nothing.
Exclusion and Restrictions: Understanding Employee Health and the Food Code
I received a call earlier in the month from a foodservice operator who suspected that one of their employees may have fallen ill and wondered if they had to send the employee home for the day. Once I started to ask a few more questions, it became obvious that the operator wasn’t really in-tune with the food code requirements on restrictions or exclusions for employees who may not be feeling well. Given that most operations are dealing with staff shortages currently and the fact that we are about to head into the fall and winter – when we tend to see an increase in upper respiratory and other illnesses, such as the flu - it seemed like a very timely and important topic for the blog this month.
Cross Contamination and the Surfaces that go Unnoticed
In October, I ran across a new research study published in the Journal of Food Protection in early-September. The article explored cross contamination in consumer kitchens during meal preparation. One of the authors was a previous SafeBites presenter, Dr. Ellen Shumaker, at North Carolina State University. Although the setting was consumer kitchens and not the commercial kitchen many of you deal with daily, the findings were very applicable to what we often see in the foodservice setting.
Emergency Preparedness: The Not-so Calm After the Storm
If you and your foodservice operation have been hit by an emergency or other disaster, what comes next and how do you move forward? Much of the answer to this is predicated on the actual disaster that you are dealing with – a flood is certainly a much different than a fire, but some of the food safety considerations remain the same if your business has been left intact and has not been damaged by the disaster.
Emergency Preparedness and Responding to a Disaster with Food Safety in Mind
As I write the first blog this month, the realities of the devastation in Florida are coming to light as we also deal with the aftermath of Hurricane Fiona, which impacted Puerto Rico late in September. Recent news has been focused on the recovery efforts for all who have been impacted. Thus, I thought it would be fitting this month to discuss emergency disaster planning resources in our first blog and delve into recovering from a disaster in our second blog later this month.
