Time and Temperature: Why 41°F to 135°F?
In one of my last blogs, I mentioned the temperature danger zone, or TDZ, as those in foodservice often refer to it. Learning the TDZ is almost a rite of passage for any new employee. Most could recite it in their sleep: “41°F and 135°F, the zone where bacteria multiply quickly.” In the foodservice environment, the TDZ isn’t just a best practice; it’s a critical defense against foodborne illness. Failing to manage time and temperature properly can lead to serious health risks, liability, and damage to the reputation of your brand.
The FDA Food Model Code sets strict guidelines: cold foods must be held at 41°F or below, and hot foods at 135°F or above. Any food that remains in the TDZ for more than 4 hours cumulatively must be discarded.
Early in my days in the industry, when I was just a teenager getting my first job, I was taught about the TDZ. What we, or at least I, didn’t understand back then was just how difficult it is to keep food out of this dreaded TDZ. For example, I don’t know if we (my fellow employees and I) fully appreciated the cooling curve for products such as soups and gravies. We would batch cook most of our soups, cool them down, and then reheat them for later service. I vividly remember being trained to take the soup off the steam-jacketed kettle at the end of the cooking process, divide the soup into two-gallon Cambro containers, and leave the lid slightly ajar so the initial heat could escape, and placing them on the counter (not in the cooler) for a half hour or so for initial cooling. After all, we didn’t want to warm up the cooler. Then, after a half hour or so, I was trained to place the product in the cooler with the lid covering the product tightly and let it cool. I know practices have changed at that operation, but back then, we thought the soup would be just fine! Now, we know that the two gallons of soup would never cool within current food code guidelines and would be within the TDA for far too long.
What I find when I conduct employee training is that most employees appreciate the TDZ and can recite it like the Pledge of Allegiance, but they really don’t understand it. I mean, truly grasp why that range was established and codified.
To fully understand the TDA, it helps to know a bit about food safety history. Although President Lincoln established the United States Department of Agriculture and the Division of Chemistry (which later became the Food and Drug Administration), public health officials really became serious about food safety in the early 1900s with the passing of the Pure Food and Drug Act. The Act was passed, in part, because of the public outcry following the publication of The Jungle by Upton Sinclair.
In the 1940s and 1950s, increased attention to military food safety intensified during World War II and the growth of industrial food production. These developments led to increased scrutiny of food handling, including time and temperature controls.
Then, in the late 1950s and early 1960s, we began to see food codes mentioning temperature criteria, which at that time were identified as either 40°F to 140°F, 45°F to 140°F, or 40°F to 150°F, depending on the source that you reviewed. These early references laid the groundwork for the standardized temperature danger zone we recognize today.
…If you have been in the industry for a while, you might recall the old TDZ to be 40°F to 140°F, which was always easily memorable in my mind. So why the change to the current 41°F to 135°F? Well, it wasn’t arbitrary…
First, it is important to understand that the food code is a mix of science, feasibility, and usability. The code document has a tough job; it must take the best of what we know about science, epidemiology, and technology; understand what is achievable in real kitchens with equipment limitations, labor constraints, and operational complexity; and make it clear enough that a foodservice manager can understand it and a regulatory official can enforce.
What was found in the scientific community about the TDA was that most common foodborne pathogens (like Salmonella, E. coli, and Listeria) grow most rapidly between 41°F and 135°F. The difference between 135°F and 140°F was not significant in the overall growth of microorganisms. Conversely, at the cold end, pathogen growth is not much different at 41°F versus the previous 40°F.
From an operator’s perspective, commercial refrigerators were more reliably able to maintain 41°F than exactly 40°F. Thus, it is easier for facilities to consistently meet and monitor 41°F. Similarly, hot-holding equipment like steam tables often stabilizes at a holding temperature of 135°F, whereas 140°F is more difficult to achieve.
Thus, the adjustment to the TDA we know today was made because of increased knowledge of pathogen growth, while trying to make the code more practical for foodservice operators to comply with, while not compromising public health.
Understanding and respecting the TDZ is one of the most important responsibilities in foodservice. Make temperature control a daily habit, build a culture of food safety, and invest in the right tools and training to ensure that your operation stays safe, compliant, and trusted. Risk Nothing.
READ MORE POSTS
Quat Binding – Why this Can Have a Disastrous Impact on Your Sanitation Program.
In June, I had the opportunity to represent FoodHandler and speak on food safety behavior for customers of Martin Bros. Distributing in Waterloo, Iowa. One of the questions that was asked caught me a little off guard. The question was about quat binding. It caught me off guard not because it was a bad question, but only because it was not something I had previously been asked nor had not yet been exposed to the phenomenon. However, I soon learned that in certain jurisdictions, it is resulting in changes to how sanitizing cloths are to be stored in sanitizing buckets (or not) in the foodservice industry. When I returned home from the trip, I had to dig into it to learn about what quat binding is and how it might impact foodservice operations.
Are Grades for Foodservice Inspections a Good Idea?
I generally try to stay away from controversial topics in my blog, but this is one I thought it might be interesting to discuss. Occasionally on my travels, I will come across a state or a local jurisdiction that requires foodservice inspection scores be posted in the window of the establishment. The idea is to allow would-be customers the ability to see how the foodservice operation in which they are about to eat scored on their latest health inspection.
Neglected Safety: CDC Report Casts Doubts on the Ability of the Foodservice Industry to Ensure Ill Workers Stay at Home
Early in June, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released a report outlining foodborne illness outbreaks in retail foodservice establishments. The report outlined outbreaks from 25 state and local health departments from 2017 through 2019.
Keeping Food Safe While Serving Outdoors
This afternoon I met some friends for lunch and as I drove through our beautiful downtown area in Manhattan, KS, I noticed that many people were taking advantage of the gorgeous weather and dining outside with friends. For our local community - outdoor dining is one of the remnants of COVID that we actually have come to enjoy on beautiful days. With spring in full swing and summer just around the corner, many foodservice operations are taking advantage of the warm weather by offering outdoor dining options.