Finding the Food Safety Training Program that is Right for You
In my final blog last month, I promised I would provide more information about food safety training programs offered for foodservice professionals. There are a few different options available to you.
Just last week, I was asked about the difference between all of them. For example, ServSafe has ServSafe Food Handler and ServSafe Manager. The Food Handler program is designed for employee-level positions and includes an assessment, but the assessment itself is not proctored. Whereas the ServSafe Manager program includes a proctored exam that must be passed at a predetermined level to be certified. The question I received was which one would suffice for the food code requirement for knowledge, to which I responded the ServSafe Manager program. Of course, the next question was why the Food Handler program would not suffice, after all it is cheaper to complete and does not require the need to find a proctor. The easy answer is because it does not have a proctored exam; however, to fully understand this, we really need to start with the food code.
Knowledge and certification requirements are spelled out in the FDA Model Food Code and are addressed in two ways. First, Section 2-102.11 mandates the knowledge requirement for the person in charge, which can be satisfied by one of three different methods: having no priority violations during the current inspection; being a certified food protection manager, having passed a test as part of an accredited program; or responding to the inspector’s questions about a variety of identified food safety topics. However, Section 2-102.11 goes on to require that for most foodservice operations, the person in charge must be a certified food protection manager who has passed an accredited test. Section 2-102.20 then goes on to state the way a food handler can satisfy the requirements spelled out in section 2–102.11 and 2-102.12 is to pass a certified food protection manager certification, which conforms to the Conference for Food Protection standards. Of course, each jurisdiction can have different standards, so it is imperative that you check your local requirements. Alaska, for example, not only requires the person in charge to be knowledgeable, but each food handler is expected to have a food worker card within 30 days of employment, which involves a food safety-focused training course, followed by passing an assessment exam.
Whichever you decide, because some jurisdictions have more stringent requirements than the conference for food protection, check with your local health department to make sure they also recognize the exam before you pay for it.
So, who is the Conference for Food Protection? Well, the United States Food and Drug Administration has a memorandum of understanding which recognizes the conference as the organization qualified to develop the standards to promote food safety. The conference is an independent, volunteer-led organization that brings together food industry experts from the government, academics, industry, and consumer organizations to address food safety issues. Several years ago, the conference identified the need to establish a set of uniform national standards to assess food safety certification programs. These standards would provide a basis to assess certification programs and allow jurisdictions (e.g., local health inspectors) to gage the quality of the certification. The conference developed the Standards for Accreditation of Food Protection Manager Certification Programs and maintains and updates these standards, as needed. The conference then contracts the American National Standard Institute to accredit these programs against the standard that the conference has developed.
With these standards in mind, the conference, and more specifically, the American National Standard Institute, works with organizations who would like to offer a food safety certification exam to make sure they meet the standards outlined by the conference. Below are organizations who are currently certified to offer the food safety certification exam and some basic information about the program.
Training: It appears this is designed for in-person training, but self-study options are allowed. There is an affiliate network that provides online training for an additional cost.
Exam: It appears the exams are done online, but only at a Pearson VUE testing center.
Training & Exam: $70.95
Self-Study Training Materials: $23.00
Exam only: $47.00
Examinees may take the exam up to three times without retaking the course. However, examinees MUST
retake the training course if failed more than three times. Additional exam vouchers will be necessary for repeated attempts.Of accredited programs, this was the most complicated of the websites to navigate.
Training: In-person or online
Exam: In-person or online, remote proctoring available.
Training & Exam: In-person costs will vary; online $152.92 plus proctor fee, $179 with testing center access. Convert to online proctoring for an additional $63.00.
Exam only: $36.00
If you fail the exam, you must repurchase a new exam, however the course remains free.
Training: Online
Exam: Remote proctoring, cost included with both the training and exam package and the exam only option.
Training & Exam: $78.00 + Remote Proctor Fee of $48.00
Exam only: $28.00 + Remote Proctor Fee of $48.00
Students allowed two attempts to pass the exam with no additional cost.
Accredited Food Manager Examinations[1]I am sure there are several of you out there who would like me to tell you which program is the best for you, but it all depends on how you learn, how you’d like to take the exam, and your budget. Certainly, there are a few programs which are designed for the employee who wants to take the class and exam from their home, but not all of us are interested in this. Look into each and use your best judgement. Whichever you decide, because some jurisdictions have more stringent requirements than the conference, check with your local health department to make sure they also recognize the exam before you pay for it.
Have you had good or bad experiences with either of these training and exams that you’d like to share? If so, drop me a note. I’d love to hear about your experiences and may be able to use this in a future blog. Risk Nothing.[1] Information is current as of 10/4/2021
[2] Fee is specific to the state and, in some cases, the county. It appears that most are $78.00.
Although I am no longer in day-to-day operations, between our students and foodservice lab at the university and my volunteer activities in my local church, I keep a close hand in food production. This past week, I had the opportunity to lead a group of men at our church in preparation of a luncheon for 100 women who were attending a spirituality retreat. Over the course of the morning, I realized our main cooler in the kitchen was not functioning properly and was about 10˚F above the required temperature. While we do have a commercial kitchen, we do not routinely log temperatures, so when the unit started to malfunction is questionable. Even more concerning was not the lunch we were preparing for, but the dinner that was served the night before for 300+ families in the parish.
Earlier this month, we began a discussion about contamination of food. Our first blog focused on chemical contamination, but in this blog, I’d like to look at physical contamination of food.
If you have followed our blogs, you have often heard us opine about food safety-related behavior and communication, food traceability, and other overarching food safety topics. We often don’t get into the weeds and discuss topics you may have learned about in your food safety training. But I thought we might circle back around and dig into a few of these topics for a few blogs. This month, I’d like to discuss food contamination, this blog will focus on chemical contamination of food and later this month, we will discuss physical contaminates.
